U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » U++ in Linux repos

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: U++ in Linux repos [message #43302 is a reply to message #43301]

Thu, 26 June 2014 19:31

dolik.rce is currently offline

dolik.rce
Messages: 1791
Registered: August 2008
Location: Czech Republic

Ultimate Contributor

dolik.rce@gmail.com

jibe wrote on Thu, 26 June 2014 18:56

The version number is not displayed in theide

I did some more tweaking. Right now, with the most recent version (7469-2) from the SL repository, I can see the version string in theide binary when I extract it from the rpm. Can you try to install that version and look at the about box please? No need to remove the configuration files, just upgrade the package. The version should be "7469-ScientificLinux_6_standard-x86_64". I know it's bit long, but I just used the easy way to figure out what distro are we compiling for.

Also, there is should now be correctly set macro IDE_VERSION (to the same value) in ide/version.h, if you have the upp-devel package installed.

jibe wrote on Thu, 26 June 2014 18:56

GCC.bm file is not good for 64 bits SL and CentOS.

Can you send me your working version? It would make things much simpler for me, if I don't have to gather all the information about SL6 filesystem from the internet Smile

Smile

Quote:

I saw also that /usr/X11R6 is mentionned in GCC.bm. This seems to have no importance to compile "Animated Hello" example, but could be a problem with others applications as this folder doesn't exists on CentOS or SL.

Having non-existent directory in build-method is not a problem. They are simply ignored.

Again, thanks a lot for your feedback!

Honza

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		U++ in Linux repos By: lectus on Tue, 06 December 2011 17:18
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Tue, 06 December 2011 18:09
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Tue, 11 March 2014 15:24
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Tue, 11 March 2014 19:41
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Wed, 12 March 2014 00:58
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Mon, 24 March 2014 21:08
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Mon, 14 April 2014 15:09
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Mon, 14 April 2014 17:46
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Tue, 15 April 2014 09:19
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Tue, 15 April 2014 15:54
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Tue, 15 April 2014 17:16
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Thu, 17 April 2014 22:38
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Fri, 20 June 2014 16:03
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Fri, 20 June 2014 17:44
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Sat, 21 June 2014 21:26
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Mon, 23 June 2014 11:08
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Mon, 23 June 2014 14:59
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Mon, 23 June 2014 16:11
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Wed, 25 June 2014 06:38
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Wed, 25 June 2014 11:30
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Thu, 26 June 2014 10:51
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Thu, 26 June 2014 18:56
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Thu, 26 June 2014 19:31
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Thu, 26 June 2014 22:41
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Sun, 29 June 2014 12:06
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Mon, 30 June 2014 18:49
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: dolik.rce on Mon, 30 June 2014 21:06
		Re: U++ in Linux repos By: jibe on Tue, 01 July 2014 12:43

Previous Topic:	Russian article about U++
Next Topic:	Github / Bitbucket Mirror

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Thu May 15 23:15:30 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03182 seconds