Home » Community » Coffee corner » Interesting observation - wxWidgets vs U++ .exe size
|
Re: Interesting observation - wxWidgets vs U++ .exe size [message #4586 is a reply to message #4575] |
Wed, 16 August 2006 00:07 |
|
fudadmin
Messages: 1321 Registered: November 2005 Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
Ultimate Contributor Administrator |
|
|
luzr wrote on Tue, 15 August 2006 19:19 | BTW, interesting observation.
wxWidgets eyecare.exe (linked with static libs) has 876 KB
U++ eyecare.exe has 840 KB
Quite good considering that wxWidgets is using native Win32 widgets while U++ basically reimplements the whole GUI
Mirek
|
(linked with static libs) Yes!
Is this even more interesting:
In memory: minimized open
=================
codeblocks 1984 k 17,780 k
theide 676 k 13,836 k
Starting times comparison - 5-10 times? (At least, codeblocks is below my patience level...)
And then, responsiveness...
I know that codeblocks is not made by J.S but it is made with wxWidgets...
Then, programming times 1:2-500-1000 ratio? (e.g hyperlinks... )
P.S.
Then, how do say in English, if someone offers to you to buy a worse product for at least double the price?
Or offers a worse job for several times less salary?
I don't know how do say in Czech but what I hear in London is:
"You must be joking!"
You can check in dictionaries...
Even more, I think, offering to use wxWidgets when U++ exists is a crime against humanity (I write for people who still haven't lost the ability to understand jokes...). Why? Wasting of human brain and computing power...
About childishness:
Quote: |
Do you know the H C Andersen’s story about the Emperor’s New Suit?
To see the truth you need the child who will say in front of all “but he has nothing on at all” - the King is naked.
|
And why children or childish people (in a good sense) are able to learn things more quickly than solid bosses? I know that very well from my learning and teaching experience...
|
|
|
|
Re: Interesting observation - wxWidgets vs U++ .exe size [message #4591 is a reply to message #4588] |
Wed, 16 August 2006 03:11 |
jadeite
Messages: 42 Registered: January 2006
|
Member |
|
|
[quote title=luzr wrote on Tue, 15 August 2006 18:21]Quote: | Anyway, my experience is that showing this attitude "naked" plus ignoring other consequences simply does not work. Understood?
|
Show them a better tool, they might look. Tell them their tool sucks, they will look away!
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Jun 17 08:29:48 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02364 seconds
|