U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Moving on with supporting old things...
Re: Moving on with supporting old things... [message #45970 is a reply to message #45968] Mon, 01 February 2016 16:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Tom1 wrote on Mon, 01 February 2016 13:05
Hi Mirek,

Is this the death of Bazaar::Protect package, which only works on MSC9, or is there a workaround?

Best regards,

Tom


I keep this in mind, but I have no time and energy to fix it Sad I have to apologize, but I do not want to hold changes just because Protect...

Why do not you try? It should be quite simple, all you need is to find or implement "length of x86 instruction" algorithm and then replace increments by 1 in 'code scrambler' by increments by length...

Mirek

[Updated on: Mon, 01 February 2016 18:30]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Looking for new names in new callbacks schema
Next Topic: [REJECTED]: VarArgs class for U++ (va_ macros replacement, in U++ stlye)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Oct 16 04:01:37 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.32390 seconds