Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Core chat... (reference counted pointers etc.)
Re: Core chat... [message #12313 is a reply to message #12298] Wed, 24 October 2007 15:30 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
cbpporter is currently offline  cbpporter
Messages: 1427
Registered: September 2007
Ultimate Contributor
luzr wrote on Tue, 23 October 2007 23:48


I am still not quite sure why people insist on such verbose syntactic sugar (it is really nothing else).

IME/IMO, there is usually much more properties to set than get and setting properties is much more convenient U++/C++ way...

Mirek


Lack of properties is one of my bigger complaints for C++ (lack of module support being on first place), and I consider them more than just syntactic sugar. I think they are better suited to express the abstract idea of a field/property than some function. And I don't see why you consider them verbose. But anyway, by the time C++ gets properties, I'm sure we'll all be 100 years old, so we can concentrate on the issue at hand (which wouldn't be solved by properties either).
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: ValueMap
Next Topic: Quick and dirty solution to .icpp problem...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat May 10 04:43:45 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02586 seconds