U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types [message #17110 is a reply to message #17109]

Tue, 29 July 2008 11:20

cbpporter
Messages: 1427
Registered: September 2007

Ultimate Contributor

mr_ped wrote on Tue, 29 July 2008 12:13

No, it does fix your problem, try it.

I know that it fixes my problem!

I wasn't arguing about that problem, I was saying that the lack of uniformity between user and implicit types is a bad thing. We should have uniform semantics so we don't get unexpected security flaws.

[Updated on: Tue, 29 July 2008 11:21]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:51
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:52
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:10
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:13
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:20
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:24
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 16:03
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 18:39
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 21:55
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:22

Previous Topic:	zlib
Next Topic:	Interesting struggle with "Moveable<T>" usage in GCC

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jun 17 05:23:26 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04133 seconds