U++ framework: UppHub » "Alternative Multithreading" revisited

Home » Developing U++ » UppHub » "Alternative Multithreading" revisited

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited [message #22282 is a reply to message #22280]

Mon, 29 June 2009 22:15

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Mindtraveller wrote on Mon, 29 June 2009 15:00

That is why you don`t need synchronization objects. Threads interact with some public member functions (delegates/messages) only and they "know" nothing more about each other. So, thread's private functions are executed (handled) in it's own thread and don`t need to do anything with synchronization.

Well, I have some experiences now (did project based on queues, now planning to rewrite it to plain old locking) and I have something to say about the topic (IMO!):

Synchronization objects are simple to manage as compared to often complex race condition relations in queued systems.

IMO, this is the exactly same problem that seems to have killed microkernels.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		"Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 29 June 2009 21:00
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: gridem on Mon, 29 June 2009 21:51
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 29 June 2009 23:15
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: mirek on Mon, 29 June 2009 22:15
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 29 June 2009 23:53
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 09 February 2010 23:37
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: koldo on Wed, 10 February 2010 09:29
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 10 February 2010 10:29
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: tojocky on Wed, 10 February 2010 22:55
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: koldo on Thu, 11 February 2010 08:15
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 21 May 2010 23:23
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 21 April 2011 14:29
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: zsolt on Thu, 21 April 2011 16:35
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: koldo on Sun, 24 April 2011 18:31

Previous Topic:	PythonPP - tiny C++ wrappers for Python C API
Next Topic:	Urr

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Sep 10 04:14:52 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00808 seconds