U++ framework: UppHub » "Alternative Multithreading" revisited

Home » Developing U++ » UppHub » "Alternative Multithreading" revisited

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited [message #22284 is a reply to message #22282]

Mon, 29 June 2009 23:53

Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.

Experienced Contributor

luzr wrote on Tue, 30 June 2009 00:15

1. did project based on queues, now planning to rewrite it to plain old locking
2. Synchronization objects are simple to manage as compared to often complex race condition relations in queued systems.
3. IMO, this is the exactly same problem that seems to have killed microkernels.

1. Mirek, this is very interesting why you decided to switch back to "classic-MT". Could we discuss it in the old topic? I've written that this approach has it`s boundaries, and it could be you jast had that case.
2. As I remember debugging app with 3+ threads and classic sync. objects - this was complete hell.
3. This is interesting too and I'd like to discuss it in the same topic. Microkernel is certainly very specific program with very strong requirements in efficiency, memory and overhead. Of course it should handle hundreds of thousands of messages per second. Alternative-MT is closer to classic GUI apps where you shouldn`t quickly handle large masses of data between threads. The same is for some types of internet server applications. In the other hand, most typical applications use 10-100 events per second and it is OK for alt-MT.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		"Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 29 June 2009 21:00
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: gridem on Mon, 29 June 2009 21:51
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 29 June 2009 23:15
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: mirek on Mon, 29 June 2009 22:15
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Mon, 29 June 2009 23:53
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Tue, 09 February 2010 23:37
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: koldo on Wed, 10 February 2010 09:29
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Wed, 10 February 2010 10:29
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: tojocky on Wed, 10 February 2010 22:55
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: koldo on Thu, 11 February 2010 08:15
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 21 May 2010 23:23
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 21 April 2011 14:29
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: zsolt on Thu, 21 April 2011 16:35
		Re: "Alternative Multithreading" revisited By: koldo on Sun, 24 April 2011 18:31

Previous Topic:	PythonPP - tiny C++ wrappers for Python C API
Next Topic:	Urr

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Jun 01 13:27:54 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00998 seconds