Home » Community » Coffee corner » Qt/Windows Open Source
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source [message #2666 is a reply to message #2663] |
Thu, 20 April 2006 16:16   |
 |
mirek
Messages: 14267 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
_Seven_ wrote on Thu, 20 April 2006 08:31 | Well Qt has been developed for a long time. I experimented use Qt development kit and comparing with the creation of layouts in U++ its clearly most advanced. Large number of applications are created with Qt , the feedback is much bigger and the support given too. I'm not take off the quality of U++, i'm one fan of U++ and i fallow the project for along time and i want continue to follow.
Now, that is a problem that exists in the project. If U++ have something to show, something for people learn and take the best of the U++, that information must have to be displayed to all comunity! Create a tutorial teaching the U++ language, with this more people came, more feedback will have.
I'm interested to learn but i don't know how!
|
OK, I was just curious. Everybody here has to agree about tutorials.
I do not get the "layouts part", but never mind 
Mirek
|
|
|
 |
|
Qt/Windows Open Source
By: _Seven_ on Tue, 18 April 2006 15:01
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: unodgs on Tue, 18 April 2006 15:48
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: _Seven_ on Thu, 20 April 2006 12:48
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: mirek on Thu, 20 April 2006 13:15
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: fudadmin on Thu, 20 April 2006 16:53
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: fudadmin on Thu, 20 April 2006 16:57
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: _Seven_ on Thu, 20 April 2006 14:31
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: mirek on Thu, 20 April 2006 16:16
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: mirek on Thu, 20 April 2006 16:19
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
|
 |
|
Re: Qt/Windows Open Source
By: fudadmin on Thu, 20 April 2006 23:04
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Aug 18 08:20:39 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04760 seconds
|