U++ framework: Newbie corner » Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW)

Home » Community » Newbie corner » Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW)

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW) [message #27026 is a reply to message #27023]

Mon, 21 June 2010 21:15

koldo
Messages: 3461
Registered: August 2008

Senior Veteran

Hello 281264

Yes, Microsoft compiler is gratis, more complete and better supported in U++ than MinGW.

However I would like that U++ will be always MinGW compatible, because perhaps some day Microsoft could decide to have a closer license.

I do not like my job to depend on one company. I have much more confidence in an Open Software project, and yet more in Gcc.

Best regards
Iñaki

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW) By: 281264 on Mon, 21 June 2010 19:10
		Re: Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW) By: koldo on Mon, 21 June 2010 21:15
		Re: Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW) By: andrei_natanael on Mon, 21 June 2010 21:34
		Re: Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW) By: koldo on Mon, 21 June 2010 22:43
		Re: Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW) By: tojocky on Tue, 22 June 2010 08:44
		Re: Compilers: Microsoft vs GCC (or MinGW) By: mr_ped on Tue, 22 June 2010 11:18

Previous Topic:	Basic question regarding callbacks
Next Topic:	How to create and add several icons to an application

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Sep 17 04:58:29 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00594 seconds