U++ framework: U++ Core » NTL and C4251

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » NTL and C4251

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: NTL and C4251 [message #2799 is a reply to message #2794]

Tue, 25 April 2006 20:10

mirek
Messages: 14290
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

jmansion wrote on Tue, 25 April 2006 09:19

You must type a lot faster than I do then.
I can't believe that anyone would argue that parser creation isn't a whole lot faster with a good generator tool

Just for reference, I am speaking about code like this:

http://upp.sourceforge.net/reference$CParser.html

Quote:

I'd rather have a formal grammar specification and a tool that can warn me of ambiguities.

Not least, it also makes it easier to create alternate implementations in other languages.

I guess above two points are quite valid - I have to agree with those advantages.

Quote:

Its certainly the case that a hand-written parser can be faster and have better diagnostics support, if you work hard enough at it.

Couriously, I always thought that the only problem of my hand-written parsers is somewhat worse perfomance compared to generated ones Wink

Mirek

[Updated on: Tue, 25 April 2006 20:10]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 14:26
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:26
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 15:34
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 19:29
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 21:29
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:44
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 22:49
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:23
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:45
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 13:54
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:07
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:20
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 14:33
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:03
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:19
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: unodgs on Tue, 25 April 2006 15:43
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 16:06
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 20:10
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:02
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Wed, 26 April 2006 10:10
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:17
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:04
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Mon, 24 April 2006 16:27
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: gprentice on Tue, 25 April 2006 06:41
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 09:45
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: gprentice on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:24
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: mirek on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:41
		Re: NTL and C4251 By: jmansion on Tue, 25 April 2006 10:26

Previous Topic:	TimeDate.cpp [BUG][FIXED]
Next Topic:	Array container does only serialize base classes

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Apr 26 06:12:08 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00830 seconds