U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST"
Re: Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST" [message #4275 is a reply to message #4274] Mon, 31 July 2006 02:41 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
fudadmin is currently offline  fudadmin
Messages: 1324
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator
fudadmin wrote on Mon, 31 July 2006 00:49

Is smart (shared) pointers of BOOST not enough to solve "value transfer semantics"? What advantages have Ptr / Pte? over them?


Or maybe a better question:

Do BOOST and STL "share" a legacy of beeing on average at least 2 times slower than U++ counterparts making some assumptions from:
http://www.ntllib.org/benchmark.html
?
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Materials for Articls: "Ultimate++ history and design fundamentals"
Next Topic: U++ connection with other tools...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Oct 10 01:50:54 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00674 seconds