Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST"
| Re: Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST" [message #4277 is a reply to message #4276] |
Mon, 31 July 2006 11:20   |
 |
fudadmin
Messages: 1324
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator |
|
|
Mirek, has anyone ever done any performance comparisons between u++ and BOOST? If not, what assumtions could be drawn?
Or, from what you've said, is a short short conclusion correct:
1. "while performance u++ vs. BOOST is the same (or very similar?), u++ reduces code, programmers headeaches and program memory.
And (AFAIK,) for big projects smaller memory usage leads to speed improvements."
2. Or "Do BOOST and STL "share" a ANY legacy of beeing on average at least 2 times slower than U++ counterparts"?
P.S.
3. Also, in other words,( as I understand):
in some cases U++ objects behave like very quick "full occupants" and destroy everything what belongs to them (and/or(?) only inside of them?),
in other (which?) cases they can be told by a programmer "be generous, don't care, "they will die themselves"... 
That means, more programmable, flexible and managable "spaggetti" relations strengths beetween objects in u++ than BOOST... ?
(I'm trying to find "visual understanding"... )
|
|
|
|
Current Time: Mon Oct 12 18:58:35 GMT+2 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00872 seconds
|
U++ framework
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
