U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST"
Re: Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST" [message #4291 is a reply to message #4289] Mon, 31 July 2006 18:03 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Well, there is much more in boost than STL related stuff....

Thinking about it, second STL feature that is not necessary in NTL is iterator concept.

Sure, any container library needs a way how to identify element. The reason why NTL does not need iterators is the invention of Index - associative container with random access.

Now considering boost, there really is a lot of stuff that somehow deals with those two STL features. On one side there are smart pointers that try to defeat copy problem. On other side there are endless attempts to introduce lambda calculus to easen iterator deadly syntax...

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Materials for Articls: "Ultimate++ history and design fundamentals"
Next Topic: U++ connection with other tools...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Oct 10 13:49:28 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.18796 seconds