Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST"
| Re: Materials for articles: "U++ Core comparison to BOOST" [message #4296 is a reply to message #4291] |
Mon, 31 July 2006 21:31   |
 |
fudadmin
Messages: 1324
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator |
|
|
Please have a look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate%2B%2B
and correct any mistakes:
| Quote: |
Ultimate's "Core" package extends the functionality of C++ with extensive use of templates similarly as Boost libraries.
The base for the fundamental differences between any C++ "container based" libraries, however, is the use and legacy of STL.
There are at least 2 fundamental innovations in Ultimate's "Core" (NTL):
1. "picked behaviour" - architectured "to be in harmony" with STL containers "copy requirement" but to improve performance by avoiding "memory traffic" while copying elements of containers.
2. Index (an associative container with random access) -designed to make STL iterator concept (and syntax) a reduntant balast and to free a programmer from most to it related problems which STL derivative libraries users including Boost libraries are bound to deal with.
|
Edit:
P.S
And suggest what else to mention/extend...
[Updated on: Mon, 31 July 2006 21:57] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Current Time: Tue Oct 13 07:28:54 GMT+2 2026
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01608 seconds
|
U++ framework
Search
Help
Members
Register
Login
Home
