U++ framework
Do not panic. Ask here before giving up.

Home » Community » PR, media coverage, articles and documentation » Working on new article...
Re: Working on new article... [message #4601 is a reply to message #4600] Wed, 16 August 2006 11:23 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14290
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Quote:


Well, I noticed that post was quite old itself. Maybe attitudes have changed since then...


Yes, when I am speaking about experiences, I am speaking about this.

Although I do not think that previous "comparisons" were unfair. OK, I missed one comment to remove in wxWidgets code and there was not that gently "disclaimer" page before the comparison. But I never said that wxWidgets or Qt or Jave is a joke Wink

BTW, interesting fact is the complaint about code not being equivalent. Later, when "testing" with other people, I have found that the most likely reason they thought that is that they simply missed that changeing the play area size, which took significant portion of code in wxWidgets code and is very compact in U++ thanks to THISBACK1 callbacks... (but I might have missed something else too).

Mirek
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: A Few observations on U++ (lack of) documentation
Next Topic: Linux releases...
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Apr 26 13:18:22 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00819 seconds