U++ framework: U++ Developers corner

Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » umk static version

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: umk static version [message #53353 is a reply to message #53351]

Mon, 30 March 2020 14:55

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

amrein wrote on Mon, 30 March 2020 13:24

A static umk binary in a source package is not a good idea in my opinion.
There is no need for this.

It is potentially faster because of BLITZ.

(OTOH, some BLITZ form could be added to makefile too).

Still, consider this experimentation phase. Obviously, there is some dissatisfaction over Linux handling, so...

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		umk static version By: mirek on Sun, 29 March 2020 16:12
		Re: umk static version By: koldo on Sun, 29 March 2020 17:01
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Sun, 29 March 2020 17:13
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Sun, 29 March 2020 17:46
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Mon, 30 March 2020 10:24
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Mon, 30 March 2020 10:25
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Mon, 30 March 2020 10:38
		Re: umk static version By: mr_ped on Mon, 30 March 2020 12:38
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Mon, 30 March 2020 13:24
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Mon, 30 March 2020 14:55
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Mon, 30 March 2020 15:33
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Mon, 30 March 2020 16:05
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Mon, 30 March 2020 16:30
		Re: umk static version By: koldo on Mon, 30 March 2020 20:43
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Mon, 30 March 2020 21:52
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Mon, 30 March 2020 22:33
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Tue, 31 March 2020 11:58
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Tue, 31 March 2020 12:52
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Mon, 30 March 2020 23:28
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Tue, 31 March 2020 21:17
		Re: umk static version By: Novo on Tue, 31 March 2020 22:20
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Wed, 01 April 2020 08:53
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Wed, 01 April 2020 09:36
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Wed, 01 April 2020 09:25
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Wed, 01 April 2020 09:44
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Tue, 31 March 2020 15:25
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Tue, 31 March 2020 22:34
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Wed, 01 April 2020 10:05
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Wed, 01 April 2020 10:26
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Wed, 01 April 2020 16:20
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Wed, 01 April 2020 16:27
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Wed, 01 April 2020 16:54
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Wed, 01 April 2020 16:55
		Re: umk static version By: Novo on Wed, 01 April 2020 17:59
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Wed, 01 April 2020 20:39
		Re: umk static version By: Novo on Wed, 01 April 2020 21:08
		Re: umk static version By: Novo on Wed, 01 April 2020 21:15
		Re: umk static version By: amrein on Wed, 01 April 2020 21:47
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Wed, 01 April 2020 23:35
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Thu, 02 April 2020 09:22
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Thu, 02 April 2020 16:36
		Re: umk static version By: mirek on Thu, 02 April 2020 17:35
		Re: umk static version By: dolik.rce on Wed, 01 April 2020 12:30
		Re: umk static version By: Novo on Wed, 01 April 2020 15:38

Previous Topic:	Support for plug-in architecture
Next Topic:	How to determine if U++ is being utilized...

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Jun 22 05:07:08 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00985 seconds