Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » SSE2 and SVO optimization (Painter, memcpy....)
Re: BufferPainter::Clear() optimization [message #54057 is a reply to message #54056] Tue, 26 May 2020 14:15 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 14261
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
Tom1 wrote on Tue, 26 May 2020 13:14
Hi!

Sorry for the delay... I was out of town for a while.

Here are my results for Windows 10 pro x64 on Core i7:

MSBT19x64:

TIMING SSE            : 37.08 ms - 37.08 ns (50.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  1.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000
TIMING Non SSE        : 129.08 ms - 129.08 ns (142.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  1.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000

MSBT19:

TIMING SSE            : 29.88 ms - 29.88 ns (45.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  1.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000
TIMING Non SSE        : 125.88 ms - 125.88 ns (141.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  1.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000

CLANG:

TIMING SSE            : 37.41 ms - 37.41 ns (50.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  2.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000
TIMING Non SSE        : 125.41 ms - 125.41 ns (138.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  1.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000

CLANGx64:

TIMING SSE            : 37.43 ms - 37.43 ns (47.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  1.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000
TIMING Non SSE        : 129.43 ms - 129.43 ns (139.00 ms / 1000000 ), min:  0.00 ns, max:  1.00 ms, nesting: 0 - 1000000


Impressive numbers Mirek! When is this going to be available on BufferPainter?

Best regards,

Tom


I guess by the end of the week. Still fixing bugs + there is like 8 variants to implement...
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Should we still care about big-endian CPUs?
Next Topic: TheIDE crash after switching package
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sat Jun 07 10:20:01 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05106 seconds