U++ framework: OS Problems etc., Win32, POSIX, MacOS, FreeBSD, X11 etc » Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux?

Home » Extra libraries, Code snippets, applications etc. » OS Problems etc., Win32, POSIX, MacOS, FreeBSD, X11 etc » Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux?

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux? [message #8232 is a reply to message #8231]

Thu, 22 February 2007 14:12

guido
Messages: 169
Registered: April 2006

Experienced Member

Try the latest deb. It works on glib-2.3 systems too.
I'm running Debian unstable.

Once you got a working copy of TheIDE, you can easily
upgrade from sources later on, if you want to. Don't
need to, though.
The toolkit has to be build locally with every upgrade
anyhow. The packages only have TheIDE in binary form.

Guido

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux? By: mikisha on Thu, 22 February 2007 12:48
		Re: Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux? By: guido on Thu, 22 February 2007 14:12
		Re: Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux? By: mikisha on Fri, 23 February 2007 01:29

Previous Topic:	some drawing problems in X11
Next Topic:	Building with LSB-SDK

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Jul 28 23:44:03 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00777 seconds