U++ framework: Releasing U++ » Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1

Home » Developing U++ » Releasing U++ » Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1

Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 [message #8486 is a reply to message #8464]

Tue, 13 March 2007 15:00

mirek
Messages: 14291
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

unodgs wrote on Mon, 12 March 2007 10:19

Well, win32 release is our MAIN release. That's why I'm preparing src file for Bas. Consistency is kept - but in opposite way. We could change it but 1) I don't see a good reason now (what that would change?)

Let see what happened to all of our rc-s - win32 release was always fine, but there was a problem in Linux. That is why I think releasing Linux version first is such a good idea.

Quote:

"Final" release should be tagged and all mainainers should sync those tagged sources.

Yes, but rc is that final release. Actually, I agree with you, the simple way is to get sources from uvs. There are no tags, but I think there is not that much uploaders to avoid problems.

OTOH, it sort of reminds me another issue - after finaly releasing, we might need to maintain 2007.1 for a while, fixing critical bugs...

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 12:04
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: ebojd on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:12
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: unodgs on Mon, 12 March 2007 15:19
		Re: Welcome and lets finish that 2007.1 By: mirek on Tue, 13 March 2007 15:00
		Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:08
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Tue, 20 March 2007 14:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: guido on Tue, 20 March 2007 15:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 21 March 2007 20:31
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: guido on Thu, 22 March 2007 00:54
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: fallingdutch on Thu, 22 March 2007 09:34
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 12:29
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 22 March 2007 14:12
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: fallingdutch on Thu, 22 March 2007 15:02
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:20
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Thu, 22 March 2007 23:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Fri, 23 March 2007 16:41
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: Novo on Sat, 24 March 2007 00:44
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Sat, 24 March 2007 17:05
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: unodgs on Sat, 24 March 2007 18:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 14:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Wed, 28 March 2007 21:10
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Wed, 28 March 2007 22:48
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: unodgs on Thu, 29 March 2007 08:41
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:31
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 14:51
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 16:01
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:38
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Thu, 29 March 2007 17:53
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: ebojd on Mon, 26 March 2007 03:32
		Re: Linux Makefile(s) By: mirek on Fri, 23 March 2007 11:33

Previous Topic:	GCC.bm problems
Next Topic:	OK, time to release.... (finally).

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue May 12 17:25:42 GMT+2 2026

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00625 seconds