Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ TheIDE » U++ TheIDE: Other Features Wishlist and/or Bugs » bugs in beta1
bugs in beta1 [message #15930] Sat, 17 May 2008 20:23 Go to next message
aftershock is currently offline  aftershock
Messages: 143
Registered: May 2008
Experienced Member
Hi!

I think I found couple of bugs.
Bug 1.
I selected the menu create makefile.
The makefile created was made for "c++" compiler while my current compiler was CL.
Bug 2.
It tried to compile addressbook example with msvc8 but the C++ compiler crashed when compiling the richtext control or similar.
I know it is Microsoft bug but just I wonder if you could change
the code so it compile it.
I tried mscv9 with the same result.
( I am on Windows XP)

Could someone acknowledge that you acknowledge this error and you will fix it?


Regards


Aftershock

[Updated on: Thu, 22 May 2008 13:35]

Report message to a moderator

Re: bugs in beta1 [message #16021 is a reply to message #15930] Fri, 23 May 2008 09:40 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
aftershock wrote on Sat, 17 May 2008 14:23

Hi!

I think I found couple of bugs.
Bug 1.
I selected the menu create makefile.
The makefile created was made for "c++" compiler while my current compiler was CL.



Well, these makefiles are rather "raw material" expected to be fixed.... OTOH, c++ vs cl is perhaps something to fix.

Quote:


Bug 2.
It tried to compile addressbook example with msvc8 but the C++ compiler crashed when compiling the richtext control or similar.
I know it is Microsoft bug but just I wonder if you could change
the code so it compile it.
I tried mscv9 with the same result.
( I am on Windows XP)



I bet you had "RELEASE" with "BLITZ". It is well known problem. And it is quite harmless, because this combination leads to long final .exe anyway. BLITZ is for debugging, not for releasing...

Mirek
Re: bugs in beta1 [message #16028 is a reply to message #16021] Fri, 23 May 2008 11:56 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mdelfede is currently offline  mdelfede
Messages: 1307
Registered: September 2007
Ultimate Contributor
luzr wrote on Fri, 23 May 2008 09:40



I bet you had "RELEASE" with "BLITZ". It is well known problem. And it is quite harmless, because this combination leads to long final .exe anyway. BLITZ is for debugging, not for releasing...

Mirek


Hemmmm.. in debian SVN builds I always use blitz to spare time... and the resulting exe is ok both in length and in speed.
Is it a windows problem only ?

Max

Re: bugs in beta1 [message #16048 is a reply to message #16028] Sun, 25 May 2008 12:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
aftershock is currently offline  aftershock
Messages: 143
Registered: May 2008
Experienced Member
It may be because I encountered this with the Microsoft compilers only.
Re: bugs in beta1 [message #16246 is a reply to message #16028] Tue, 03 June 2008 19:57 Go to previous message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
mdelfede wrote on Fri, 23 May 2008 05:56

luzr wrote on Fri, 23 May 2008 09:40



I bet you had "RELEASE" with "BLITZ". It is well known problem. And it is quite harmless, because this combination leads to long final .exe anyway. BLITZ is for debugging, not for releasing...

Mirek


Hemmmm.. in debian SVN builds I always use blitz to spare time... and the resulting exe is ok both in length and in speed.
Is it a windows problem only ?

Max




In GCC there seems to be no problem, except the binary size.

Please try nonBLITZ release build and compare the size with BLITZ build.

Mirek
Previous Topic: [BUG] Ide loses "maximized" setting on minimize
Next Topic: Annoying mouse wheel scrool bug in editor
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Mar 29 14:59:16 CET 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02387 seconds