unodgs Messages: 1366 Registered: November 2005 Location: Poland
Ultimate Contributor
I think build and package mangment (reading and accessing project structure) code could be separated from the ide. That would allow to create real umk which dosn't need ide to build a project. This also would reflect in much simpler "startup" makefile (easier to maintain) on unix systems. With this makefile anyone could build umk and then using umk the whole upp. What do you think about that?
I think build and package mangment (reading and accessing project structure) code could be separated from the ide. That would allow to create real umk which dosn't need ide to build a project. This also would reflect in much simpler "startup" makefile (easier to maintain) on unix systems. With this makefile anyone could build umk and then using umk the whole upp. What do you think about that?
unodgs Messages: 1366 Registered: November 2005 Location: Poland
Ultimate Contributor
Quote:
(OTOH, new Export solves some of these problems
I haven't tried this new feature yet, maybe creating better umk has no sense now. On the other hand you would not have to call export project each time it changes having umk.
I'll try to investigate how much build process is integrated with ide and what time cost separating is.
I haven't tried this new feature yet, maybe creating better umk has no sense now. On the other hand you would not have to call export project each time it changes having umk.
I'll try to investigate how much build process is integrated with ide and what time cost separating is.
Well, the main advantage of "separated" umk is that you would be able to run it on systems without X11 libraries....
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
