U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ MT-multithreading and servers » SlaveProcess should be moved from Web to Core

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

SlaveProcess should be moved from Web to Core [message #2145]

Sun, 02 April 2006 13:25

hojtsy
Messages: 241
Registered: January 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Experienced Member

There is a SlaveProcess class in Web package. I think this functionality is not connected to Web, and should rather be where the Thread functionality is: in the Core package.

Report message to a moderator

Re: SlaveProcess should be moved from Web to Core [message #2158 is a reply to message #2145]

Sun, 02 April 2006 15:57

mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

hojtsy wrote on Sun, 02 April 2006 07:25

There is a SlaveProcess class in Web package. I think this functionality is not connected to Web, and should rather be where the Thread functionality is: in the Core package.

I more or less agree (as does Tom who recuctantly put it to the Web), however the trouble is that SlaveProcess derivate uses Socket which still is in the Web...

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Re: SlaveProcess should be moved from Web to Core [message #2159 is a reply to message #2158]

Sun, 02 April 2006 16:14

fudadmin
Messages: 1321
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Ultimate Contributor
Administrator

luzr wrote on Sun, 02 April 2006 14:57

hojtsy wrote on Sun, 02 April 2006 07:25

There is a SlaveProcess class in Web package. I think this functionality is not connected to Web, and should rather be where the Thread functionality is: in the Core package.

I more or less agree (as does Tom who recuctantly put it to the Web), however the trouble is that SlaveProcess derivate uses Socket which still is in the Web...

Mirek

To move both or a separate package?

Report message to a moderator

Re: SlaveProcess should be moved from Web to Core [message #2160 is a reply to message #2158]

Sun, 02 April 2006 16:15

hojtsy
Messages: 241
Registered: January 2006
Location: Budapest, Hungary

Experienced Member

You mean the RemoteSlaveProcess? That could stay in Web. I think it is normal for a non-Core class to derive from a Core class. Still the LocalSlaveProcess should be usable withouth the Web package.

Report message to a moderator

Re: SlaveProcess should be moved from Web to Core [message #2162 is a reply to message #2160]

Sun, 02 April 2006 17:54

mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

hojtsy wrote on Sun, 02 April 2006 10:15

You mean the RemoteSlaveProcess? That could stay in Web. I think it is normal for a non-Core class to derive from a Core class. Still the LocalSlaveProcess should be usable withouth the Web package.

Well, I have that on ToDo for quite some time.

There definitely will be a huge codequake soon: T* packages will be removed from uppsrc (while move some worthy packages to Core/CtrlLib), Socket and *SlaveProcess will be moved to Core, PCRE package added etc...

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Core multithread dangers
Next Topic:	Web/TServ [BUG][FIXED]

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Apr 19 04:12:26 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06199 seconds