Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » OSes: request for "advertising" audit
OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7558] Sat, 06 January 2007 12:32 Go to next message
Werner is currently offline  Werner
Messages: 234
Registered: May 2006
Location: Cologne / Germany
Experienced Member

I've incorporated Mirek's statement on the current state of porting Ultimate++ to various operating systems (message #7463) into my web site.

May I respectfully ask everybody who is involved in this topic to check whether my interpretation is correct?

Werner

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7560 is a reply to message #7558] Sat, 06 January 2007 14:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
MacOS/X11 runs on both x86 (and x86-64) and PowerPC CPUs (not only on PowerPC).

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7568 is a reply to message #7560] Sat, 06 January 2007 17:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Werner is currently offline  Werner
Messages: 234
Registered: May 2006
Location: Cologne / Germany
Experienced Member
luzr wrote on Sat, 06 January 2007 14:18

MacOS/X11 runs on both x86 (and x86-64) and PowerPC CPUs (not only on PowerPC).


Thanks. Corrected.

Werner

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7573 is a reply to message #7568] Sun, 07 January 2007 01:42 Go to previous messageGo to next message
lundman is currently offline  lundman
Messages: 175
Registered: March 2006
Location: Tokyo
Experienced Member

I didn't have too much issue porting it to NetBSD, i386 only at the time, but not reason other CPUs can't be made to run.

Didn't realise Solaris was wanted, it is all we run at work. Pretty sure I have Purify installed too, if you feel really confident about your code Smile

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7574 is a reply to message #7573] Sun, 07 January 2007 07:12 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Werner is currently offline  Werner
Messages: 234
Registered: May 2006
Location: Cologne / Germany
Experienced Member
lundman wrote on Sun, 07 January 2007 01:42


I didn't have too much issue porting it to NetBSD, i386 only at the time, but not reason other CPUs can't be made to run.

Didn't realise Solaris was wanted, it is all we run at work. Pretty sure I have Purify installed too, if you feel really confident about your code Smile



Thanks for your response.

I understand that you succeeded in porting Ultimate++ to NetBSD running on an x86 cpu machine. So, can I tell the visitors of my web site that basically Ultimate++ runs under NetBSD and ... Embarassed that you are willing to help if problems arise? Rolling Eyes

Did I get you right that, as far as you see, Ultimate++ should run under Solaris, too?

Werner

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7585 is a reply to message #7574] Sun, 07 January 2007 23:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
masu is currently offline  masu
Messages: 378
Registered: February 2006
Senior Member
Hi Werner,

Ultimate++ is also only tested on an i386 machine on FreeBSD (which also runs on several platforms).

Matthias

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7598 is a reply to message #7574] Tue, 09 January 2007 11:37 Go to previous messageGo to next message
lundman is currently offline  lundman
Messages: 175
Registered: March 2006
Location: Tokyo
Experienced Member
Yes, NetBSD compile was fine, minor tweaks.. I can do a package for 601, and even submit patches (few) now that I know that they have a chance to be used. (sorry, just been burnt before Smile )

No, I don't mind helping. But it is MUCH easier if you have one IDE to build another. The commandline building is harder.

Lund

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7601 is a reply to message #7598] Tue, 09 January 2007 11:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
mirek is currently offline  mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
Ultimate Member
lundman wrote on Tue, 09 January 2007 05:37

The commandline building is harder.



Chicken-egg problem Wink That is why I am so glad we have working Mac X11 IDE now, that will speed up things a lot...

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7602 is a reply to message #7585] Tue, 09 January 2007 14:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Werner is currently offline  Werner
Messages: 234
Registered: May 2006
Location: Cologne / Germany
Experienced Member
masu wrote on Sun, 07 January 2007 23:15

Hi Werner,

Ultimate++ is also only tested on an i386 machine on FreeBSD (which also runs on several platforms).

Matthias



Thanks.

At the next opportunity I'll rephrase that more precisely on my web site.

Werner

Report message to a moderator

Re: OSes: request for "advertising" audit [message #7603 is a reply to message #7598] Tue, 09 January 2007 14:57 Go to previous message
Werner is currently offline  Werner
Messages: 234
Registered: May 2006
Location: Cologne / Germany
Experienced Member
lundman wrote on Tue, 09 January 2007 11:37

Yes, NetBSD compile was fine, minor tweaks.. I can do a package for 601, and even submit patches (few) now that I know that they have a chance to be used. ...



Thanks.

At the next opportunity I'll rephrase this topic more precisely on my web site.

Werner

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Funny way how to speed string equality comparison
Next Topic: Interesting advantage of using indices instead of iterators
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Apr 18 13:36:15 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01413 seconds
.:: Contact :: Home ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.5.
Copyright ©2001-2013 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software