Home » Community » Coffee corner » post there a screenshot of your upp workspace :_)[OBSOLETE]
|
|
| Re: post there a screenshot of your upp workspace :_) [message #3434 is a reply to message #3432] |
Thu, 25 May 2006 01:17   |
 |
fudadmin
Messages: 1321
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator |
|
|
| qwerty wrote on Wed, 24 May 2006 20:56 |
...if the admins has nothing against it :>
|
...If you want these forums to be shut down in the nearest future...
The free space left is 200MB (from 400MB). Your screenshot is 0.5MB. Count yourself. But even the bigger problem is that the search engines spiders eat bandwidth by indexing them on a regular basis. At the moment I blocked them until I resolve that picture indexing problem.
So, at least try to make smaller *.png ...
[Updated on: Thu, 25 May 2006 01:18] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: post there a screenshot of your upp workspace :_) [message #3474 is a reply to message #3473] |
Fri, 26 May 2006 09:51 |
 |
mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
| fudadmin wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 02:48 |
| luzr wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 05:44 |
| fudadmin wrote on Thu, 25 May 2006 21:59 |
| qwerty wrote on Thu, 25 May 2006 07:17 |
oh, I apologize
|
No, no need to apologize. You can post screenshots but I just think *.png format is much more compact than *.jpg for them.
|
Incorrect...
Mirek
|
Then share your knowledge and tell how to make my screenshot smaller *.jpp...
http://www.arilect.com/upp/forum/index.php?t=msg&th=1002 &start=0&
Edit: Without losing quality.
|
.jpg (what is .jpp?) is always losing quality. That is why it produces smaller files... whereas .png is lossless format, and even not very good one (it internally uses zlib to compress scanlines of image, not very effective...).
.jpg of real-world picture will always be order of magnitude shorter than .png (real world pictures do not compress well using zlib).
For screenshots, this may or might not be true - usually you can get order of magnitude shorter .jpg, but with visible degradation. In this particular case, .jpg is way better, because there is a lot of color transitions and real-world picture background.
Mirek
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: post there a screenshot of your upp workspace :_) [message #3477 is a reply to message #3476] |
Fri, 26 May 2006 10:08 |
|
mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
| fudadmin wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 03:59 |
That means, anyway, for the same quality png is smaller, especiallly screenshots...  Or can you demonstrate otherwise with my screenshot?
|
Yes, that is by definition.
However, to conserve forum space, you should rather recommend using low-quality .jpg - they would still be good enough to provide the information, but 3-4 times shorter.
Mirek
-
Attachment: test.jpg
(Size: 5.27KB, Downloaded 1529 times)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: post there a screenshot of your upp workspace :_) [message #3483 is a reply to message #3482] |
Fri, 26 May 2006 10:52 |
|
fudadmin
Messages: 1321
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
Ultimate Contributor
Administrator |
|
|
| luzr wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 09:45 |
In this case, .png is made shorter because there are very big areas of single color (white, light-gray). Those compress well with zlib.
However, still considering now deleted screenshot that started this discussion, that one WOULD be shorter using .jpg.
Anyway, I guess we could agree: to show us how many nice backgrounds you have in your XP desktop, upload elsewhere and post link. For screenshots dealing with actual problems, use either .png or .jpg, what fits better. Us as much compression as possible.
Mirek
|
Agree, but I expected that people would post screenshots with a lot of single color...
[Updated on: Fri, 26 May 2006 10:52] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: post there a screenshot of your upp workspace :_) [message #3484 is a reply to message #3483] |
Fri, 26 May 2006 11:11 |
|
mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
| fudadmin wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 04:52 |
| luzr wrote on Fri, 26 May 2006 09:45 |
In this case, .png is made shorter because there are very big areas of single color (white, light-gray). Those compress well with zlib.
However, still considering now deleted screenshot that started this discussion, that one WOULD be shorter using .jpg.
Anyway, I guess we could agree: to show us how many nice backgrounds you have in your XP desktop, upload elsewhere and post link. For screenshots dealing with actual problems, use either .png or .jpg, what fits better. Us as much compression as possible.
Mirek
|
Agree, but I expected that people would post screenshots with a lot of single color...
|
Well, for some reason, some people consider desktop with a lot of single color not beautiful enough 
Mirek
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Apr 20 01:16:42 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04924 seconds
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
