|
|
Home » Community » U++ Webs: Functioning, Layout , Design, Features and Structure of these forums, homepage etc. » A few moments for the search engine optimization site ultimatepp.org
A few moments for the search engine optimization site ultimatepp.org [message #24689] |
Wed, 27 January 2010 10:13 |
|
1. Static header Articles site (not forum) - always Ultimate++. This is very bad for search engine optimization.
TITLE tag must be different for each page. In the simplest case, it should reflect the article title.
Ideally, it should consist of 2 - 3 parts of different levels of detail.
For example:
Overview Ultimate++ :: Ultimate++
or (Overview Ultimate++ - Ultimate++)
Maybe
Overview Ultimate++ :: Ultimate++ - Ñ++ programming environment
Thus the region with the highest weight value of key words - TITLE would normally be used.
2. On the pages, the headlines are not identified in the tag H1 - is also a big drawback.
With styles for tags can be H1 - H5 form the same formatting, but the weight of words in the H1 tag is much higher than a simple paragraph of text!
I think that uppweb can recognize a large font inside tpp-file and replace it with the tag H1.
SergeyNikitin<U++>( linux, wine )
{
    under( Ubuntu || Debian || Raspbian );
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: A few moments for the search engine optimization site ultimatepp.org [message #24791 is a reply to message #24789] |
Sat, 30 January 2010 08:36 |
|
And if we just go into the subject the correct URL.
The fact URL
http://www.ultimatepp.org/www$uppweb$overview$en-us.html
or even
http://www.ultimatepp.org/www/uppweb/overview-en-us.html
contains a lot of excess.
This URL contains the keywords, without which it could well be indispensable. For example the word www uppweb this URL could well be thrown out and replaced by "Ultimate" and "programming environment". And more correct URL would be
http://www.ultimatepp.org/ultimate/overview_programming_envi ronment-en-us.html
or
http://www.ultimatepp.org/ultimate/c++_new_approach-en-us.ht ml
In addition, I want to say on the site should make more use of the separation of style (CSS) and content.
In the confirmation propose - look as arranged HTML code main menu - there is a description format for each menu item is repeated. But it must be done in the CSS style class and specify only the reference to the class.(Unnecessary words in the markup - is to reduce the weight of useful words)
Well, very useful in the menu to use Tooltip ballons (tag TITLE). keywords used in the TITLE tag of hyperlinks have much more weight than the words in plain text.
For images, too, must use TITLE tags and ALT (not for the convenience of users but for search engine optimization)
These are mistakes that I have yet noticed.
In practice, of course all of these rules hard to follow. For sites that I do (I am not a professional in this field), I do not always able to follow all the rules.
So all I said is just a wish.
SergeyNikitin<U++>( linux, wine )
{
    under( Ubuntu || Debian || Raspbian );
}
[Updated on: Sat, 30 January 2010 08:47] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Apr 23 08:29:52 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02061 seconds
|
|
|