Home » Developing U++ » Mac OS » PLATFORM_MACOSX vs PLATFORM_OSX11
 PLATFORM_MACOSX vs PLATFORM_OSX11 [message #32901] |
Sat, 18 June 2011 23:59 |
 |
daveremba
Messages: 32
Registered: June 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA, USA
|
Member |
|
|
Hello,
background:
I've been working on a port of U++ for the current
MacOSX 10.6.7 on Intel 64 bit iMac hardware.
I think an alpha version will be ready
for testing soon (1-2 weeks maximum).
The current U++ code base was very close to working
(it needed only minor changes).
The port I did uses X11 rather
than the native MacOSX UI, and therefore looks a little
different from native Mac apps,
but seems to work fine.
a proposal:
I'd like to suggest changing the current OSX11
flag to MACOSX. Here is why:
1. I think OSX11 is a little confusing - it might mean
any OS that has X11, or it might mean OSX ... etc.
2. The OS on Mac is formally called MACOSX,
and X11 is one of its components.
Also, in current MacOSX 10.6.7 on Intel 64 with gcc
there are some system flags that may be a little
different that the current U++ expects:
__linux is not defined
__APPLE__ is defined
implementation:
to implement the flag change that
is proposed:
file: Core/config.h would now read:
...
#if __linux
#define PLATFORM_LINUX 1
// added:
#elif __APPLE__
#define PLATFORM_MACOSX 1
#define PLATFORM_BSD 1
#else
// removed APPLE from below
...
The other files that PLATFORM_MACOSX would effect
for this port are:
Core/Core.h
Core/Cpu.cpp
CtrlCore/CtrlCore.upp
Draw/Draw.upp
ide/Builders/GccBuilder.cpp
ide/Builders/MakeFile.cpp
ide/Core/Host.cpp
only a few lines in each file;
so, not very much.
other changes:
1. a config file for Ndisasm on MacOSX/Intel64/gcc
was added, and a Makefile flag need
2. To fix a UI bug, there was a change made to:
CtrlCore/CtrlKbd.cpp
Ctrl::SetFocus0(bool activate)
based on another thread:
[BUG?] X11 (at least OSX) Menus displayed under TopWindow, owner=RootWindow [message #30902]
I added the suggested code, wrapped inside
PLATFORM_OSX11, so other platforms are not
affected.
Thank you to Honza, and all the others
who worked to get that problem under
control.
poll & feedback from senior developers
After I get clarification on this, I'll get a
version of the U++ MACOSX port available for
anyone who would like to test it.
Thanks,
Dave
[Updated on: Sun, 19 June 2011 00:21] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Apr 20 02:19:42 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02834 seconds
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
