Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » RM: "Patch ready"
|
|
| Re: RM: "Patch ready" [message #33988 is a reply to message #33985] |
Fri, 07 October 2011 11:37   |
Sender Ghost
Messages: 301
Registered: November 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Hello, Mirek.
I would like to clarify this topic.
Now, if developer create a patch and submit it for the issue, (s)he need to select "Patch ready" status, right?
In what situations, after this, the status of the issue can be selected for "Ready for QA" and later for "Approved"/"Rejected"? And who really must select this after (e.g. issue starter, developer who did quality analysis and/or applied the patch to repository)?
[Updated on: Fri, 07 October 2011 12:22] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: RM: "Patch ready" [message #33992 is a reply to message #33988] |
Fri, 07 October 2011 21:51 |
 |
mirek
Messages: 13975
Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
| Sender Ghost wrote on Fri, 07 October 2011 05:37 |
Hello, Mirek.
I would like to clarify this topic.
Now, if developer create a patch and submit it for the issue, (s)he need to select "Patch ready" status, right?
In what situations, after this, the status of the issue can be selected for "Ready for QA" and later for "Approved"/"Rejected"? And who really must select this after (e.g. issue starter, developer who did quality analysis and/or applied the patch to repository)?
|
Ideal sequence:
Well, there is issue. Person A finds it and posts (directly or inderectly) to RM.
Person B, without direct write priviledges to update uppsrc fixes it. Posts a patch to the very same RM issue as "Patch ready"
Person C (one from "cxl", "trc" or "unodgs") checks the patch, applies it to uppsrc, commits svn, changes to "Ready for QA" and assigns the task back to A to check it solved the problem.
Does it makes sense? My problem was that "Ready for QA" was the status for QA person, preferably the one that has submitted the issue....
Surely, in practice, I will make it "Approved" after applying the patch quite often, but that is another issue (like missing QA ? 
Mirek
|
|
|
|
| Re: RM: "Patch ready" [message #33997 is a reply to message #33992] |
Fri, 07 October 2011 23:29 |
Sender Ghost
Messages: 301
Registered: November 2008
|
Senior Member |
|
|
| mirek wrote on Fri, 07 October 2011 21:51 |
Does it makes sense?
|
Yes, it makes sense.
Paraphrasing, "Ready for QA" is responsibility of A, if C wants to check quality of applied patch(es) from A point of view. Further, A changes issue status to "Approved" or writes comments about new issue(s). The "Ready for QA" issue status is not mandatory.
Thanks for answering.
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Apr 19 08:20:30 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02578 seconds
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
