Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » U++ Library support » U++ Library : Other (not classified elsewhere) » About RS232
Re: About RS232 [message #39409 is a reply to message #39397] Fri, 15 March 2013 22:45 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
jibe is currently offline  jibe
Messages: 294
Registered: February 2007
Location: France
Experienced Member
Thanks for the replies Smile

jerson wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 16:00

I am not sure what kind of errors you get. I use only the windows platform and the code works well on it.

... And I'm almost sure that it can work with Linux as well : As I said, it's just that there is not the same methods ! I had just a quick try and did not study well all that, probably it's just different names...

I posted immediately before going further just to know if there is some good reason. If not, I'll just make so that the class is exactly the same for Linux or Windows, as far as possible.

jerson wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 16:00

I'd like to collaborate if there is any movement on this and may also add the modbus RTU feature if prodded. Right now, I am juggling too many things and time sharing is hard.

You do as you can according to your free time. If it's possible for you, I'll let you try and eventually debug the Windows part, as I'm working only under Linux.

Zbych wrote on Fri, 15 March 2013 16:04

If you want I can help you with linux part of serial port implementation.

First you should tell me what interface you want.

Thanks Smile

But for now, I'm just beginning to discover what has been already done. I think that it will be enough for what I have to do (just read the output of an A/D converter and display the signal like an oscilloscope).

I'll see later in more details your proposition, when I'll know better jerson's package. I think it's already good, but could be better with some enhancements or additions like a more complete Open function with flow control and parity as you propose : if we make a package to add to upp, it must be some more complete.

[Updated on: Fri, 15 March 2013 22:47]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon9.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon3.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message icon14.gif
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: templated callback
Next Topic: Memory Mapped Files
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 19 07:27:46 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04129 seconds