Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Extra libraries, Code snippets, applications etc. » OS Problems etc., Win32, POSIX, MacOS, FreeBSD, X11 etc » Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux?
Re: Why glibc-2.4 and not glibc-2.3 is needed for U++ on Linux? [message #8232 is a reply to message #8231] Thu, 22 February 2007 14:12 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
guido is currently offline  guido
Messages: 169
Registered: April 2006
Experienced Member
Try the latest deb. It works on glib-2.3 systems too.
I'm running Debian unstable.

Once you got a working copy of TheIDE, you can easily
upgrade from sources later on, if you want to. Don't
need to, though.
The toolkit has to be build locally with every upgrade
anyhow. The packages only have TheIDE in binary form.

Guido
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: some drawing problems in X11
Next Topic: Building with LSB-SDK
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Nov 26 00:01:07 CET 2020

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02013 seconds