Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Extra libraries, Code snippets, applications etc. » U++ Esc Interpreter, Esc Macros and templates » ESC_STRING and other questions
Re: ESC_STRING and other questions [message #15924 is a reply to message #14821] Fri, 16 May 2008 13:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
galious is currently offline  galious
Messages: 28
Registered: March 2008
Promising Member
luzr wrote on Sun, 16 March 2008 10:41

Shire wrote on Sun, 16 March 2008 05:18



Well, simple script languages must not force user to worry about types. But even non-professional applied programmers differ string and array. Strings have many specific operations, like toupper, find-and-replace, regexp, etc, which is useless on arrays.




Actually, I agree with toupper, but IMO find-and-replace or even regexp are not that useless for arrays...



I don't even agree with toupper. toupper can be viewed as tr(anslate|ansliterate) which can be found in Perl or sed and many other languages. tr on it's turn can be viewed as a specialised version of find-and-replace, which on its turn does have its use for arrays.

Quote:

Quote:


Additionally, IMHO, majority of simple scripts work with strings hard, and I cannot imagine script language without native string type with standard operations.



You do not need to imagine. Esc is one Wink


Euphoria with it's concept of sequences and atoms is another one. I'm probably one of only a few people who like as less as possible build-in types of which one can create it's own types.

Martin
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: ESC and the path of Package
Next Topic: missing lambda
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 26 00:30:46 CEST 2024

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06478 seconds