Activity
From 08/05/2012 to 09/03/2012
09/03/2012
- 11:06 PM Feature #323: Customizable signal handlers in Skylark
- You mean making void SkylarkApp::Signal(int signal) virtual? Well, that might be actually even better :) And some of ...
- 08:48 PM Feature #323: Customizable signal handlers in Skylark
- Should not it be rather virtual method than Callback in this case?
- 07:41 PM Feature #323 (Approved): Customizable signal handlers in Skylark
- What about adding a callback to SkylarkApp that could be called on SIGUSR1 signal?
My current use-case would be assi... - 02:08 PM Bug #322 (Approved): Resolve Accept/prefork issue
- Works OK, not a single fail so in ~600 request. Also fixed many "500 Internal server error" that I initially thought ...
- 11:06 AM Bug #322 (Ready for QA): Resolve Accept/prefork issue
09/02/2012
- 04:29 PM Bug #322 (Approved): Resolve Accept/prefork issue
- TcpSocket::Accept does not work well in prefork scenario.
- 08:39 AM Feature #321 (Approved): Resolve Web package issue
- (remove from docs, at least...)
08/30/2012
- 10:22 AM Bug #320 (Approved): IDE: Problem when Ctrl+Tab in log of running program
- - still issues with autosave / opening "Save" warning
08/28/2012
- 09:50 PM Feature #319: Allow user modify response headers in Skylark
- EDIT: corrected the example
- 09:45 PM Feature #319 (Approved): Allow user modify response headers in Skylark
- Skylark user has currently no way to influence the headers sent in the response. This is IMHO wrong, especially for C...
08/06/2012
08/05/2012
- 12:47 PM Feature #112 (Approved): Document Value.h
- 12:47 PM Feature #176 (Rejected): Consider anihilating plugin/z in favor of "import by include" technique
- 12:35 PM Feature #318 (New): Add lockless support to Core and allocator
- 09:37 AM Bug #185 (Rejected): Investigate weird QTF formatting (why is Udaj centered?)
Also available in: Atom