U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX #include <bits/atomicity.h> for POSIX ?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

#ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX #include <bits/atomicity.h> for POSIX ? [message #10585]

Tue, 17 July 2007 19:37

masu
Messages: 378
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

Hi,

is the include (lines 340 to 342) in Core.h really needed?

#ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX
#include <bits/atomicity.h>
#endif

The include on my system is not needed, at least the compiler does not complain.

Background for this question is a compile error when using GCC 4.2 where atomicity.h is located in ext dir and I wonder if I can simply uncomment it.
I need this information for FreeBSD 7 systems, since GCC 4.2 is the default compiler there.

Matthias

931b81e7ea53320dccc37375b34b38c3

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10595 is a reply to message #10585]

Tue, 17 July 2007 23:05

mirek
Messages: 14257
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

It is important in MT. It introduces atomic incerements / decrements.

Try to compile something MT to find out Wink

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10602 is a reply to message #10595]

Wed, 18 July 2007 10:29

masu
Messages: 378
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

Thanks, I guessed that, but I have also tried with a MT app and it works.
I double-check again today.
Can somebody try it on another POSIX platform?

Matthias

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10603 is a reply to message #10602]

Wed, 18 July 2007 13:53

mirek
Messages: 14257
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

It is not unlikely that it is indirectly included by some other header (GCC version of std::string e.g.).

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10611 is a reply to message #10603]

Wed, 18 July 2007 23:07

masu
Messages: 378
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

Ok, what about replacing mentioned section with

#ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX
#ifdef COMPILER_GCC
#if __GNUC__ > 3
#include <ext/atomicity.h>
#else
#include <bits/atomicity.h>
#endif
#else
#include <bits/atomicity.h>
#endif
#endif

maybe it is needed to also include minor version number with __GNUC_MINOR__ in the check (I only checked with gcc 4.2).

Matthias

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10639 is a reply to message #10611]

Fri, 20 July 2007 10:22

mirek
Messages: 14257
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Why not, but I am sure I have built the current code with GCC4.1....

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10643 is a reply to message #10639]

Fri, 20 July 2007 10:56

fudadmin
Messages: 1321
Registered: November 2005
Location: Kaunas, Lithuania

Ultimate Contributor
Administrator

then I can confirm that I'm using gcc 4.2.0 (ArchLinux) and it requires <ext/atomicity.h>
But I can't remember if that changed with 4.2 or 4.1.xx

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10644 is a reply to message #10639]

Fri, 20 July 2007 11:21

masu
Messages: 378
Registered: February 2006

Senior Member

luzr wrote on Fri, 20 July 2007 10:22

Why not, but I am sure I have built the current code with GCC4.1....

Then I suggest to also use __GNUC_MINOR__:

#ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX
#ifdef COMPILER_GCC
#if ((__GNUC__ > 3) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ > 1))
#include <ext/atomicity.h>
#else
#include <bits/atomicity.h>
#endif
#else
#include <bits/atomicity.h>
#endif
#endif

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10848 is a reply to message #10644]

Wed, 01 August 2007 16:26

mirek
Messages: 14257
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

OK, why not...

Report message to a moderator

Re: #ifdef PLATFORM_POSIX [message #10856 is a reply to message #10848]

Wed, 01 August 2007 18:03

mirek
Messages: 14257
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

Well, I have checked removal variant and it works for me. Most likely, the required stuff is included with STL.

So I have just removed the #include for now.

(Sorry for takeing so long...).

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	best way to parse XML/svg/html style kind attribute pairs?
Next Topic:	Array & Gdiplus::Pen problem

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon May 12 08:21:28 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03256 seconds