Home » U++ Library support » U++ Libraries and TheIDE: i18n, Unicode and Internationalization » 16 bits wchar
Re: 16 bits wchar [message #11796 is a reply to message #8036] |
Wed, 26 September 2007 01:56   |
sergei
Messages: 94 Registered: September 2007
|
Member |
|
|
As much as I'd like to see RTL in U++, I agree that unicode should, if possible, be fixed. RTL is built upon unicode, so a solid base - unicode strings storage - is essential. Who knows, maybe tomorrow someone will need Linear B.
I was thinking of UTF-32 as a possible main storage format. I wrote a simple benchmark to see what are the speeds with the 3 sizes of character. Here are the results (source attached):
Size: 64; Iterations: 10000000; 8: 2281; 16: 2125; 32: 2172;
Size: 128; Iterations: 5000000; 8: 1625; 16: 1453; 32: 2391;
Size: 256; Iterations: 2500000; 8: 1328; 16: 1515; 32: 1578;
Size: 512; Iterations: 1250000; 8: 1375; 16: 1141; 32: 1141;
Size: 1024; Iterations: 625000; 8: 1172; 16: 953; 32: 984;
Size: 2048; Iterations: 312500; 8: 1094; 16: 875; 32: 906;
Size: 4096; Iterations: 156250; 8: 1109; 16: 938; 32: 859;
Size: 8192; Iterations: 78125; 8: 1110; 16: 890; 32: 922;
Size: 16384; Iterations: 39062; 8: 1000; 16: 813; 32: 4047;
Size: 32768; Iterations: 19531; 8: 1000; 16: 2250; 32: 3906;
Size: 65536; Iterations: 9765; 8: 1656; 16: 2172; 32: 3812;
Size: 131072; Iterations: 4882; 8: 1625; 16: 2125; 32: 3782;
Size: 262144; Iterations: 2441; 8: 1593; 16: 2110; 32: 3781;
Size: 524288; Iterations: 1220; 8: 1563; 16: 2109; 32: 3984;
IMHO, 32-bit values aren't much worse than 16-bit. For search/replace operations - non-32-bit values would have significant overhead for characters outside main plane.
Converting UTF-32 to other formats shouldn't be a problem. But what I like most is that character would be the same as cell (unlike UTF-16 which might have 20 cells to store 19 characters).
Edit: I didn't mention that I tested basic read/write performance. UTF handling would add overhead to 8 and 16 formats, but not to 32 format. I also remembered the UTF8-EE issue. UTF-32 could solve it easily. IIRC only 21 bits are needed for full unicode, so there's plenty of space to escape to (without overtaking private space).
-
Attachment: UniCode.cpp
(Size: 1.31KB, Downloaded 520 times)
[Updated on: Wed, 26 September 2007 02:30] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
 |
|
16 bits wchar
By: riri on Mon, 05 February 2007 17:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 05 February 2007 23:07
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Tue, 25 September 2007 22:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 25 September 2007 23:18
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 07:43
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 08:48
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 14:55
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 15:37
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 22:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 01 October 2007 14:28
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:42
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:26
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 12:10
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 21:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 04 October 2007 17:33
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:52
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:59
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 17:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 23:57
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 10:47
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 19:37
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 01:56
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 16:54
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 19:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 13:27
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:11
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 09 November 2007 10:39
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 11 November 2007 18:45
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Wed, 23 July 2008 22:04
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:07
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 17:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:14
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:20
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:26
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:51
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 10:42
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:12
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 16:10
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 17:40
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 20:01
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 15:32
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 18:25
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: cbpporter on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:13
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sun, 07 September 2008 13:24
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:03
|
 |
|
Re: 16 bits wchar
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:01
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Aug 25 09:02:47 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06192 seconds
|