Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Core chat... (reference counted pointers etc.)
Re: Core chat... [message #12331 is a reply to message #12325] |
Thu, 25 October 2007 14:06   |
mdelfede
Messages: 1308 Registered: September 2007
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
luzr wrote on Thu, 25 October 2007 05:33 |
Consider composition a.At(x).At(y)... It can become tedious.
|
yes, but finding At() kind of bugs can be even more tedious...
There you could write :
a.CheckSize(x).CheckSize(y);
a[x][y];
if [][] operators can be joined, if not
a.CheckSize(x).CheckSize(y);
a.At(x).At(y)
You need only CheckSize to return a reference to array a as usual in upp.
Quote: |
Also, this is not the only place you need be aware of the problem:
a.Add() = a[0];
|
That could be solved with a construct like
where Dup() should have an obvious function.or
a.Grow(1);
a.Last() = a[0]
for example, or something similar. The point is to avoid potentially dangerous cases.
Of course, all that cost something in term of code lines, (besides the Dup() example...) but nothing in terms of code speed, but avoids many possible caveats.
I *do not* criticize retourning references, that's needed for speed sakes, but I think a generic class like an array should make potentially dangerous constructs impossible.
Ciao
Max
|
|
|
 |
|
Core chat... (reference counted pointers etc.)
By: mirek on Tue, 23 October 2007 23:48
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 16:37
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Wed, 24 October 2007 17:46
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 18:23
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Wed, 24 October 2007 20:24
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 22:05
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Wed, 24 October 2007 23:36
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Thu, 25 October 2007 05:33
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Thu, 25 October 2007 14:06
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Thu, 25 October 2007 14:34
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Thu, 25 October 2007 15:19
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Thu, 25 October 2007 18:02
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Thu, 25 October 2007 19:52
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Thu, 25 October 2007 21:33
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Thu, 25 October 2007 23:26
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Thu, 25 October 2007 23:38
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Thu, 25 October 2007 23:47
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Fri, 26 October 2007 09:36
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Fri, 26 October 2007 12:13
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Fri, 26 October 2007 12:42
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Fri, 26 October 2007 13:03
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Fri, 26 October 2007 14:01
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Fri, 26 October 2007 14:18
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Fri, 26 October 2007 22:09
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Fri, 26 October 2007 23:13
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Fri, 26 October 2007 23:51
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Fri, 26 October 2007 18:47
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Fri, 26 October 2007 22:12
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Fri, 26 October 2007 23:09
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Fri, 26 October 2007 23:55
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:08
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:16
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Sat, 27 October 2007 13:06
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 14:50
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Sat, 27 October 2007 15:21
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 16:02
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Sat, 27 October 2007 16:28
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: sergei on Wed, 24 October 2007 19:49
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mdelfede on Wed, 24 October 2007 20:06
|
 |
|
Re: Core chat...
By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 21:46
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sun May 11 22:50:34 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03915 seconds
|