U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Libraries and TheIDE: i18n, Unicode and Internationalization » 16 bits wchar

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: 16 bits wchar [message #12333 is a reply to message #12308]

Thu, 25 October 2007 14:47

cbpporter is currently offline

cbpporter
Messages: 1427
Registered: September 2007

Ultimate Contributor

I also wrote a conversion algorithm from Utf8 to Utf16, which is quite similar to my previous one.

Since I already done these, I would like to optimize them a little. I have a couple of questions though.

1. My code point extraction routine is a little to long and quite redundant. The same sequence that handles an incorrect value is called a lot of times. I would like to get rid of these repetitions. I could use a macro, but I don't like to expose a dangerous macro to the rest of the file, so I could undef it after the function. Or, this would be the perfect case to where the use of goto could be justified and almost needed. Can I use goto?

EDIT:
P.S.: The modifed version of utf8codepointEE optimized and using goto is 49 lines long, while the original was 115. And I still consider it pretty clear, maybe even more clear because I can it on one screen.

2. The algorithm is a little bit inefficient because it first calculates the length of the new buffer, and then it fills it. But by calculating the length, we already get enough info to populate it with the correct values, reducing the number of calculations by half. But if I do this, I would need to preallocate first a possibly bigger than necessary buffer, fill it directly, than copy it in the new string and free the buffer. This has one extra allocation, and I'm not sure how efficient allocations are in U++. AFAIK, you replaced the default allocator. If it has similar efficiency as the standard one, the price of the allocation is not that large, but maybe you are against this approach as it more STL like, with allocating a lot of extra data and doing copies. If the allocator is faster, or if you have a caching mechanism, than I think that it could be a lot faster this way.

[Updated on: Thu, 25 October 2007 15:57]

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		16 bits wchar By: riri on Mon, 05 February 2007 17:19
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Mon, 05 February 2007 23:07
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 25 September 2007 22:03
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 25 September 2007 23:18
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 07:43
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 08:48
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 14:55
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 15:37
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 26 September 2007 22:40
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Mon, 01 October 2007 13:24
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Mon, 01 October 2007 14:28
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 03 October 2007 06:16
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:11
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:23
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:42
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:26
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 03 October 2007 10:36
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 12:10
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 03 October 2007 14:43
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 03 October 2007 21:40
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Thu, 04 October 2007 13:15
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Thu, 04 October 2007 17:33
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Thu, 04 October 2007 19:49
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 12 October 2007 10:25
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:27
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:52
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 11:59
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 12 October 2007 13:54
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 12 October 2007 16:25
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Fri, 12 October 2007 17:03
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Mon, 15 October 2007 15:01
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Mon, 15 October 2007 16:49
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 16 October 2007 11:13
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:19
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Sun, 21 October 2007 23:46
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 23:57
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Mon, 22 October 2007 09:34
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 10:47
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Mon, 22 October 2007 17:57
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Mon, 22 October 2007 19:37
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Sun, 21 October 2007 20:14
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 01:56
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: sergei on Wed, 26 September 2007 16:54
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 26 September 2007 19:11
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 24 October 2007 11:58
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 24 October 2007 13:27
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 24 October 2007 14:05
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Thu, 25 October 2007 14:47
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:11
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 06 November 2007 13:31
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Fri, 09 November 2007 10:39
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Sat, 10 November 2007 17:34
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Sun, 11 November 2007 18:45
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 04 July 2008 17:12
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 23 July 2008 15:22
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Wed, 23 July 2008 22:04
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Sat, 02 August 2008 13:27
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Sat, 02 August 2008 18:34
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Sat, 02 August 2008 19:01
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Sun, 03 August 2008 14:51
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:07
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:53
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 17:14
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Mon, 04 August 2008 22:47
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:03
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:12
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:14
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:18
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:20
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:24
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:26
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:32
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 00:51
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 10:42
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 05 August 2008 12:03
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:12
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:19
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Tue, 05 August 2008 15:57
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Wed, 06 August 2008 13:33
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Thu, 07 August 2008 08:41
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 16:10
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Thu, 07 August 2008 17:33
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 17:40
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Thu, 07 August 2008 18:37
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Thu, 07 August 2008 20:01
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 08 August 2008 13:34
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 15:32
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 08 August 2008 15:47
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Fri, 08 August 2008 18:25
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Sat, 09 August 2008 01:45
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: cbpporter on Fri, 05 September 2008 19:13
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Sun, 07 September 2008 13:24
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Mon, 04 August 2008 15:03
		Re: 16 bits wchar By: mirek on Sat, 27 October 2007 11:01

Previous Topic:	Arabic words from file
Next Topic:	Not possible to get .t files

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Mon Apr 28 16:45:59 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.04165 seconds