Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Community » U++ community news and announcements » Upp 2008.1beta2 v2 released
Re: Upp 2008.1beta2 v2 released [message #15223 is a reply to message #15221] Thu, 10 April 2008 12:48 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
unodgs is currently offline  unodgs
Messages: 1367
Registered: November 2005
Location: Poland
Ultimate Contributor

Quote:

I have 2 reasons to do so... from my historic experience I don't believe compilers (it's not like I hit a bug in them every month or so, actually probably less than 1 bug per year, but it made my faith gone)

this must be a really historical argument Wink
Quote:

, and for me it's easier to "parse" parentheses in head, than to think about interaction between operators, as the parentheses is one *single* rule, and there are *many* operators. I got so far that in my source I already see ((a * b) + c);

ok, that's an argument. However parentheses in every subexpression is wrong imo. I think acceptable form for you and us (not idiots Wink )is
return (c >= 'a' && c <= 'z') || (c >= 'A' && c <= 'Z') || (c == '_');

only to split ors
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Scripts to build debian packages added to SVN repository
Next Topic: SVN Restructuration
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Sun Aug 24 13:34:57 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00757 seconds