|
|
Home » U++ Library support » U++ SQL » PostgreSQL Support Classes [Experimental]
|
|
Re: PostgreSQL Support Classes [Experimental] [message #9095 is a reply to message #9037] |
Tue, 17 April 2007 09:08 |
|
jibe
Messages: 294 Registered: February 2007 Location: France
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
Hi zsolt,
Thanks for your reply ! Maybe I worry only because I'm just discovering UPP, and have no experience with it !
To go back to the topic :
luzr wrote on Mon, 16 April 2007 20:37 | PRIMARY_KEYS("KEY1, KEY2, KEY3")
does not sound that bad...
|
Yes, it looks like very much what I use with Firebird, and is also common with some other databases...
unodgs wrote on Mon, 16 April 2007 22:42 | It looks fine to me! Maybe except S letter at the end sugessting multiple primary keys. But if you could add it to sql schema do it please!
|
Yes, I think also that this S is not so usefull... Why not
PRIMARY KEY ("UNIQUE_KEY")
or
PRIMARY KEY ("KEY1, KEY2, ...")
It seems logical, and I don't see any ambiguity ? But maybe I don't know enough yet about all consequences in upp...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: PostgreSQL Support Classes [Experimental] [message #15675 is a reply to message #15633] |
Sun, 04 May 2008 10:15 |
|
Thank you! its worked! I will testing in continuation!
I have a situation: I need to make a server and client application. that in code i need decide where it will execute (server or client). Only application server can communicate with DB server, but client is connected with server. Server and client appliction need becouse:
1. The client station can/may be not so performace as server station.
2. Connection from DB server and application server can be more speedily.
If I wrong tell me please how is correct! How I can create this?
Thank you!
John!
P.S. The ultimate ++ is the most impression me!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Thu Jun 06 07:08:05 CEST 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.02538 seconds
|
|
|