Home » U++ Library support » U++ Library : Other (not classified elsewhere) » Uninitialized class members.
Re: Uninitialized class members. [message #15751 is a reply to message #15748] |
Wed, 07 May 2008 04:10   |
Novo
Messages: 1430 Registered: December 2006
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
mdelfede wrote on Tue, 06 May 2008 17:18 | It would be quite interesting to integrate Valgrind inside the ide....
Max
|
That would be useful. Especially because there is no adequate GUI tool for valgrind at the moment. I've been using valkyrie, which is QT-based, but it doesn't work with valgrind 3.3.0. vim is pretty good in handling of valgrind's output (as usual).
I'd like to mention that valgrind is just a framework. I was running a tool called memcheck, which is based on valgrind. There are other valgrind-based tools. Most popular beside memcheck are callgrind and helgrind.
memcheck can produce XML output. So, the only thing left is to parse that XML and put data into a grid or a tree.
There is a cool example of GUI for callgrind called kcachegrind.
Regards,
Novo
[Updated on: Wed, 07 May 2008 04:27] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
 |
|
Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Tue, 06 May 2008 17:31
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Tue, 06 May 2008 19:44
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Tue, 06 May 2008 20:34
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Tue, 06 May 2008 21:27
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Tue, 06 May 2008 21:30
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Tue, 06 May 2008 21:36
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Tue, 06 May 2008 21:42
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Tue, 06 May 2008 21:50
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Wed, 07 May 2008 04:10
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Wed, 07 May 2008 09:57
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Wed, 07 May 2008 16:32
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Wed, 07 May 2008 17:38
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Thu, 08 May 2008 00:21
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Wed, 07 May 2008 17:40
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: cocob on Wed, 07 May 2008 17:55
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Wed, 07 May 2008 19:51
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Wed, 07 May 2008 22:47
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Wed, 07 May 2008 23:05
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Thu, 08 May 2008 01:00
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Thu, 08 May 2008 05:37
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Thu, 08 May 2008 08:00
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Fri, 09 May 2008 04:37
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Sun, 11 May 2008 18:01
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Sun, 11 May 2008 20:43
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: mirek on Sun, 11 May 2008 22:56
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Mon, 19 May 2008 23:20
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
|
 |
|
Re: Uninitialized class members.
By: Novo on Fri, 30 May 2008 06:06
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Aug 26 15:46:02 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05069 seconds
|