Overview
Examples
Screenshots
Comparisons
Applications
Download
Documentation
Tutorials
Bazaar
Status & Roadmap
FAQ
Authors & License
Forums
Funding Ultimate++
Search on this site
Search in forums












SourceForge.net Logo
Home » Developing U++ » UppHub » quicktabs vs tabbar
Re: quicktabs vs tabbar [message #16278 is a reply to message #16272] Thu, 05 June 2008 18:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Oblivion is currently offline  Oblivion
Messages: 1226
Registered: August 2007
Senior Contributor
Quote:


Hi,

I was wondering where the difference between these 2 bazaar packages is. In my current project I could need something like theses packages and I wanted to use the "current" one if there is something like that Wink
Is one of theme the successor of the other or which one is better/more feature rich?
I took a look at what TheIDE uses as tabs and it uses QuickTabs but not from the bazaar but from yet another package: ide/QuickTabs

So why are there 2(3) packages for the same?



AFAIK, Quicktabs was originally a integral part of TheIDE. It was made "public" by unodgs as to make a seperate and easy to use custom Tab Ctrl (it was also used in my DockCtrl package). The main difference between tabbar and Quicktabs lies in their tab image handling. Mrjt's tabbar (which is mainly developed for his Docking package) uses a relatively faster method (pre-caching of images) and supports (or, afaik, will support) transparent tab dragging. etc.

Nevertheless, Quicktabs (the seperate one) is going be developed too (by unodgs himself, or if he permits again Smile I am going to finalize it as a seperate, full-fledged tabctrl with plenty of useful functions).


[Updated on: Thu, 05 June 2008 18:52]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: SystemLog class updated
Next Topic: Added SVN Library
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Aug 28 15:50:12 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06490 seconds