U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types [message #17112 is a reply to message #17108]

Tue, 29 July 2008 11:24

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

cbpporter wrote on Tue, 29 July 2008 05:10

Yes, using that At works if you want to initialize it there.

I was talking about the way user defined classes get their default constructor called, while implicit types get left initialized.
It should be more uniform.

And since user types do get their constructor called, I don't think there is any performance difference between what I'm proposing and the current situation.

Actually, this aspect of C++ is quite confusing. For any user type, creating a variable of that type without further params calls default constructor.

Not so for fundamentals. But you can "call default constructor" for them as well - which assigns zero to them.

Anyway, I think there is some small performance impact for At - assigning zero is not free. Usually, this would be negligible, but I can imagine several usages where it could have significant impact.

Mirek

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:51
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 10:52
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:10
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:13
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:20
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:24
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 16:03
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mirek on Tue, 29 July 2008 18:39
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: cbpporter on Tue, 29 July 2008 21:55
		Re: Using Vector::At doesn't initialize implicit types By: mr_ped on Tue, 29 July 2008 11:22

Previous Topic:	zlib
Next Topic:	Interesting struggle with "Moveable<T>" usage in GCC

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Wed Aug 27 18:00:29 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.11332 seconds