Home » Community » Coffee corner » Stuck with icq
Stuck with icq [message #15476] |
Fri, 25 April 2008 19:04  |
bytefield
Messages: 210 Registered: December 2007
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
Hi,
i don't want to offend anyone but icq site is a mess. After few minutes that i spent with icq, I've decided to remove my account and guess what, you cannot remove your account directly from the site (I don't know if that's possible from their programs, because i haven't installed Windows OS on my box).
So, you others programmers, how do you communicate each others, especially u++ core programmers (icq, mail, chat, YM, forum, etc.)?
cdabbd745f1234c2751ee1f932d1dd75
[Updated on: Fri, 25 April 2008 21:52] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
Re: Stuck with icq [message #15478 is a reply to message #15477] |
Fri, 25 April 2008 21:00   |
bytefield
Messages: 210 Registered: December 2007
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
Isn't YM a better solution for communications, or maybe a chat room? Should we develop a build-in-house software for communication ? It will unify developers, using all the same software they can communicate better.
I'm thinking at something with file transfer support, announcement when svn, uvs, cvs, git (or others cvs's) repository have changed, creating discussions (public and private)rooms with active users, guest and spectators.
A software which announce you when a message is posted on forum, etc.
cdabbd745f1234c2751ee1f932d1dd75
|
|
|
Re: Stuck with icq [message #15480 is a reply to message #15478] |
Fri, 25 April 2008 21:32   |
 |
mirek
Messages: 14255 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
bytefield wrote on Fri, 25 April 2008 15:00 | Isn't YM a better solution for communications, or maybe a chat room? Should we develop a build-in-house software for communication ? It will unify developers, using all the same software they can communicate better.
I'm thinking at something with file transfer support, announcement when svn, uvs, cvs, git (or others cvs's) repository have changed, creating discussions (public and private)rooms with active users, guest and spectators.
A software which announce you when a message is posted on forum, etc.
|
Could be interesting. Anyway, for now, ICQ 
Mirek
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Stuck with icq [message #15495 is a reply to message #15487] |
Sat, 26 April 2008 10:54   |
bytefield
Messages: 210 Registered: December 2007
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
I made a "compromise" until we have something better and still have an icq account. I use it from Pidgin, but it's not specialized on icq communications, so if someone could suggest a better client for icq, available on Linux(Ubuntu).
cdabbd745f1234c2751ee1f932d1dd75
|
|
|
|
Re: Stuck with icq [message #15553 is a reply to message #15476] |
Tue, 29 April 2008 03:30   |
 |
tvanriper
Messages: 85 Registered: September 2007 Location: Germantown, MD, USA
|
Member |
|
|
Honestly, I can't stand IM systems, in general.
When I have to communicate with someone, I either use e-mail, or forums.
Unless, of course, I can walk down the hall and talk to the person.
I find IMs terribly disruptive. They demand attention immediately, when perhaps I might need to focus on a problem. I may as well pick up a ringing phone.
But, I seem to be the minority in this opinion... a lot of my friends love to IM each other... so I'm perhaps old-fashioned or something.
|
|
|
Re: Stuck with icq [message #15558 is a reply to message #15553] |
Tue, 29 April 2008 09:39   |
mdelfede
Messages: 1308 Registered: September 2007
|
Ultimate Contributor |
|
|
tvanriper wrote on Tue, 29 April 2008 03:30 | Honestly, I can't stand IM systems, in general.
When I have to communicate with someone, I either use e-mail, or forums.
Unless, of course, I can walk down the hall and talk to the person.
I find IMs terribly disruptive. They demand attention immediately, when perhaps I might need to focus on a problem. I may as well pick up a ringing phone.
But, I seem to be the minority in this opinion... a lot of my friends love to IM each other... so I'm perhaps old-fashioned or something.
|
IMHO im are very good to solve quickly a problem, when it's there.
Just think you've an app opened, it doesn't behave as expected, with im you can follow step-by-step instructions and show/solve the problem. With forums/mails it would take forever....
Of course a phone call is even better, but it's usually not cheap, and sometimes the language barriers are strong 
OTOH, for long-term problems, forums are much better.
Max
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Stuck with icq [message #15566 is a reply to message #15559] |
Tue, 29 April 2008 12:09   |
bytefield
Messages: 210 Registered: December 2007
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
cocob wrote on Tue, 29 April 2008 10:49 | Are phone calls expensive in your countries ?
|
Local calls aren't expensive, they are free on weekend and after 17:00 I guess, but international call cost a lot and like Massimo was saying "sometimes the language barriers are strong". I don't even write English very well, but what if I talk, maybe you will understand me or I will understand you but not as well as I want.
Quote: | the IM often annoys me a lot.
|
Be invisible, ignore annoying messages(switch sounds off, etc.), clean-up your list, remove unwanted "friends", request your friends to not send to you unwanted mass messages (they should put you in a separate group, or something ).
Quote: |
2min call can cost me as much as my breakfast.
|
Well, don't eat your breakfast for a month and talk on phone for one hour. Or use my "advices" and use IM, YM, ICQ, etc. Don't let your friends to annoy you, if they are good friends and want you to be their friend they will make that move for you or if you are kind(understanding) you will ignore all mass message and live with mess unless you get something better ore you switch off the IM forever.
P.S.: I like using forum too because here you have nothing to hide and sharing your knowledge will help sometimes other people (if they know using search button )
cdabbd745f1234c2751ee1f932d1dd75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Apr 26 14:28:09 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.01789 seconds
|