Home » Developing U++ » Documentation » T++ working
Re: T++ working [message #18928 is a reply to message #18922] |
Sat, 01 November 2008 09:03  |
 |
mirek
Messages: 14267 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
cbpporter wrote on Fri, 31 October 2008 15:27 |
First of all what happened to code references? They no longer have a leading "::" and the small little boxes only pick up documentation if it's reference does not have the leading "::". Am I supposed to remove the resolution operator from doc references?
|
Yes, I have removed them. They were both redundant and confusing (because, in fact, we are in Upp namespace now).
Quote: |
Second: does the Alt-10 function still work? If yes, maybe a button for it should be added.
|
It does, but it is considered as temporary hidden helper to convert old docs.
Quote: |
Third: is the style that is used when inserting new items final? If yes, there are still some small bugs, like the name of the type being underlined sometimes, but other times not.
|
It should be underlined if the type is user defined -> has its own coderef. In that case, hyperlink is created. (Help browser is able to handle coderef hyperlinks).
I have also noticed that at least one time it did not work right - some issue can be there.
Quote: |
Also a small suggestion: the hyperlink input should have a small "x" button on the right, which clears the hyperlink.
Another suggestion: make the help browser back-buffered. It is extremely flickery.
And a small bug: clicking on the font size toggle button in the help browser does not refresh the content. I have to click on another topic and click back to get an updated font size.
|
[/quote]
OK
Mirek
|
|
|
 |
|
T++ working
By: mirek on Fri, 31 October 2008 15:24
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mr_ped on Fri, 31 October 2008 16:57
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: chickenk on Fri, 31 October 2008 17:56
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Fri, 31 October 2008 18:49
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: captainc on Fri, 31 October 2008 23:53
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 01 November 2008 09:04
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: tojocky on Mon, 03 November 2008 08:19
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Mon, 03 November 2008 10:38
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: tojocky on Mon, 03 November 2008 13:37
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: chickenk on Mon, 03 November 2008 14:14
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Mon, 03 November 2008 15:45
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: chickenk on Mon, 03 November 2008 15:50
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Mon, 03 November 2008 20:44
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Thu, 06 November 2008 19:29
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: captainc on Fri, 07 November 2008 23:41
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 15 November 2008 14:48
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 08 November 2008 14:27
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mdelfede on Sun, 09 November 2008 10:48
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 15 November 2008 14:50
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Wed, 19 November 2008 22:47
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: captainc on Fri, 21 November 2008 03:10
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: tojocky on Fri, 21 November 2008 07:34
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Tue, 10 March 2009 22:40
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Fri, 13 March 2009 09:35
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 08 November 2008 14:24
|
 |
|
Re: T++ working
By: mirek on Sat, 01 November 2008 09:03
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Wed Aug 27 21:10:35 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06171 seconds
|