U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Status & Roadmap

Authors & License

Funding Ultimate++

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ MT-multithreading and servers » what about WorkQueue : public CoWork

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Return to the default flat view

Create a new topic

Submit Reply

Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue [message #24907 is a reply to message #24901]

Wed, 03 February 2010 20:45

mirek is currently offline

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

kohait00 wrote on Wed, 03 February 2010 09:14

thus an app is able to specify maybe "Workgroups". say following case:

task A, B, C each depends on each other, cause they might use same ressources, so best execute them in one thread somewhere else else than main thread, task C, D, E, are again each dependant on each other but *NOT* dependant on A, B, C, so they get their own WorkQueue (and Thread), and so are able to be executed sequentially related to each other, but parallelly related to other independant groups.. sounds complicated, right? hope it still makes sense

using the same static pool would mean using a bunch of threads, so supplied work to WorkQueue again gets executed parallely, but not sequentially (=>queue). in that case one could stick to CoWork usage, there is no difference then

Note that the static pool only limits the number of threads running in parellel at any single time - which is a good thing, as you also have limited number of cores... I would say it has little to do with dependency of tasks.

Report message to a moderator

Send a private message to this user

[Message index]

		what about WorkQueue : public CoWork By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 07:26
		Re: what about WorkQueue : public CoWork By: koldo on Wed, 03 February 2010 08:22
		Re: what about WorkQueue : public CoWork By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 08:58
		first, CoWork.h and CoWork.cpp cleanups By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 12:07
		WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 12:14
		Re: what about WorkQueue : public CoWork By: mirek on Wed, 03 February 2010 12:36
		Re: what about WorkQueue : public CoWork By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 13:31
		changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 15:03
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: mirek on Wed, 03 February 2010 15:08
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 15:14
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: mirek on Wed, 03 February 2010 20:45
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Wed, 03 February 2010 21:58
		2 basic problems By: kohait00 on Mon, 08 February 2010 22:29
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: mirek on Tue, 09 February 2010 10:56
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Tue, 09 February 2010 15:14
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: mirek on Mon, 15 February 2010 12:49
		Re: changed CoWork and derived WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Tue, 16 February 2010 14:44
		BUGFIX to WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Thu, 18 February 2010 16:02
		Re: BUGFIX to WorkQueue By: kohait00 on Fri, 19 February 2010 08:47

Previous Topic:	DnD hangs in MT Refresh()ing
Next Topic:	Linux MT problems with time functions

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

PDF

]

Current Time: Thu Aug 28 15:50:07 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06488 seconds