|
|
|
Home » Developing U++ » U++ Developers corner » Graduation thesis - Camouflage - a replacement of(a part of) Chameleon
| Re: Graduation thesis - Camouflage - a replacement of(a part of) Chameleon [message #25232 is a reply to message #25231] |
Mon, 15 February 2010 11:39   |
andrei_natanael
Messages: 262
Registered: January 2009
|
Experienced Member |
|
|
| luzr wrote on Mon, 15 February 2010 11:47 |
| Tom1 wrote on Sat, 13 February 2010 13:19 |
Hi,
Please, never add any dependencies to any SOs/DLLs in packages belonging to uppsrc. In other 'optional' nests, I don't care, but just keep the uppsrc clean of them.
I seriously think the basic GUI framework should be kept as simple and robust as possible. Ultimate++ has become a vitally important tool for me to create commercial software products and anything that makes things more complex, usually causes loads of customer support that can't be charged for.
I can understand that 'eye candy' is needed for certain segment of software products, but simplicity and reliability is more important for me and my clients, so I suggest the 'eye candy' packages come in only as an option for those interested -- not by default.
|
No worry, your concerns are absolutely shared - I have the same issues to work with - supporting apps that consist of many dynamic libraries is significantly more difficult.
|
There should be no worry 
I found a way to use it in U++ without modifying U++ source, someone would just add Camo package to his project and then Camouflage will be used instead of U++ theming - that's easy because current skinning implementation  .
Andrei
|
|
|
|
Current Time: Wed Apr 30 06:25:21 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00652 seconds
|
|
|
Members
Pages
Help
Register
Login
Home
