|
|
Home » Community » Coffee corner » Which is the biggest drawback of U++ "unpopuliarity"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Which is the biggest drawback of U++ "unpopuliarity"? [message #2781 is a reply to message #2770] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 10:57 |
|
fudadmin
Messages: 1321 Registered: November 2005 Location: Kaunas, Lithuania
|
Ultimate Contributor Administrator |
|
|
riri wrote on Tue, 25 April 2006 08:43 |
Quote: | The most commercial programs are for Windows.
|
Must have commercial ambitions to be proud of using u++ ?
|
Wrong formulation of the question which shows wrong understanding of the situation.
I want, at least, u++ users (and creators) not to be ashamed and ridiculed (which is a normal stage of every inovation...) because of using it...
And, I'm very sure, it's in everyone's interests to make u++ better and more popular.
Because - unfortunately - pshycological labeling prevails at this stage of humans development. That's why police, army and priests etc. wear uniforms... That's why most people choose not the better things but "more popular".
You need to reach some critical point when mass and popularity becomes "self expanding". Endless story of "The King's dead! Long live the King!..."
[Updated on: Tue, 25 April 2006 10:57] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Which is the biggest drawback of U++ "unpopuliarity"? [message #2836 is a reply to message #2831] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 21:07 |
prof
Messages: 7 Registered: April 2006
|
Promising Member |
|
|
It seems to me that the whole talk was focused just on "GUI toolkit" part of upp, and everybody left TheIDE and build system used by UPP without attention they deserve.
By "look and feel" I didn't mean the widgets - I meant TheIDE in comparison to VS IDE, upp build system in comparison to MCVC solutions, Boost.Build, Perforce Jam, makefiles, autotools etc.
I'm not a GUI developer. 90% of my needs for UI are satisfied by printf() call. The toolkit is good, but it isn't revolutionary. There are such things like Mozilla XUL/XRE and Tk. But the idea of packages impressed me. Finally there is a chance for source tree to become ordered. Finally, someone tried to introduce "modular concepts to C++ programming" (a quote from upp home page).
Talking about the widgets, they look ugly for me. I wouldn't use them in a software product I want to sell to plain home or corporate users. Of course, if I just want a quick and dirty UI, or if I make a prog for one customer for his personal use, it's ok. The widgets resemble early linux desktops and win16 (especially when I try to open a file). I hope that themes will fix this issue, and the UI will look more beautiful. Like Firefox, like Visual Studio, like Office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Which is the biggest drawback of U++ "unpopuliarity"? [message #2844 is a reply to message #2843] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 22:56 |
|
prof wrote on Thu, 27 April 2006 16:19 | I'm XP user and I use "windows classic" theme. I think that these look better than TheIDE. Maybe, it's just due to colorful icons and fancy toolbar grips I used to?
|
Well, I don't see nothing better on these screenshots..
IMO Xp style looks very well, even better than oryginal. Yes there are some places to improvement like adding shaded left pane in menu bar or making toolbars similar to those from vs, but u++ gui look dosn't deserve to calling it ugly.
BTW TheIde goal is not to be beautiful but useful and comfortable. I coded long time in vs and bcb and IMO neither of them was better than theide (I'm not talking about vs + visual assist)
|
|
|
Re: Which is the biggest drawback of U++ "unpopuliarity"? [message #2846 is a reply to message #2844] |
Fri, 28 April 2006 00:34 |
prof
Messages: 7 Registered: April 2006
|
Promising Member |
|
|
Yes. TheIDE is comfortable for me as for a developer. VisualAssist is just a code completion engine smarter than Intellisense. TheIDE already has a completion engine, and just need to make the c++ parser more complete. So there's nothing wrong with TheIDE.
I unfortunately do see a big difference between the widgets in those apps I mentioned and upp widgets. Maybe we should make a new poll - how many other people do see a difference in looks significant enough in order not to use upp GUI for their programs.
Compare Office 97 and Office 2003, 7zip and WinZip/WinRar, early Mozilla themes and Firefox. I've seen Mozilla before and refused to migrate due to its awful themes. But when I saw Firefox 0.8 with it's perfect Qute theme, it was the first open source GUI I really liked. When in 0.9 Qute was replaced with a more conservative theme, a lot of people were disappointed. So the community fixed the default theme in Firefox and now I'm equally comfortable with both.
And also two examples from the Web: http://www.visual-eiffel.com/front_content.php and http://www.sgi.com/support/custeducation/courses/linux/altix _adv_sys_adminii.html
The two pages just represent some textual information. No super DHTML/AJAX, no drop down menus etc on both pages. All usability recomendations seems to be followed. I can't tell what's wrong with the first page, but I definitely liked the latter more. It looks more balanced, more professional.
[Updated on: Fri, 28 April 2006 00:35] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Fri Nov 01 01:09:21 CET 2024
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.03168 seconds
|
|
|