U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers [message #28533 is a reply to message #28101]

Mon, 06 September 2010 10:53

mirek
Messages: 14267
Registered: November 2005

Ultimate Member

kohait00 wrote on Mon, 16 August 2010 03:06

then
T& Array::operator[](int i) with Array::GetCount()-1.
actually 3 invokations, that could be done in one.

Could be done with Top().

I am likely to make this change, but I am still waiting for 3rd party opinion...

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 29 July 2010 22:17
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Tue, 03 August 2010 11:15
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: andrei_natanael on Tue, 03 August 2010 12:53
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Tue, 03 August 2010 16:06
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: andrei_natanael on Tue, 03 August 2010 22:44
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 04 August 2010 09:57
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 05 August 2010 08:35
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mrjt on Thu, 05 August 2010 09:55
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 05 August 2010 10:10
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 06 August 2010 11:27
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Fri, 06 August 2010 11:48
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 09 August 2010 08:50
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 13 August 2010 09:38
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 16 August 2010 09:06
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 30 August 2010 10:46
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Mon, 06 September 2010 10:53
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 06 September 2010 11:52
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Wed, 08 September 2010 09:00
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: rylek on Wed, 08 September 2010 10:24
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 08 September 2010 10:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Wed, 08 September 2010 11:30
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 17 September 2010 08:11
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Fri, 17 September 2010 09:15
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 October 2010 09:02
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Thu, 21 October 2010 11:10
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 October 2010 11:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 30 March 2011 10:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Sat, 16 April 2011 20:31
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 14:46
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Sun, 17 April 2011 21:43
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 18 April 2011 09:00

Previous Topic:	InitCaps() proposal
Next Topic:	Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Aug 25 11:11:20 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06177 seconds