U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers [message #28794 is a reply to message #28792]

Fri, 17 September 2010 09:15

kohait00
Messages: 939
Registered: July 2009
Location: Germany

Experienced Contributor

hi mirek, thanks.
just a question aside: why does DeepCopyConstryct return T& instead of T*? it kinda differs from the other 'patterns' DeepCopyNew, ::new(p) T() etc..which all return T* at that level.

EDIT: i think i understand why..there occure strange compile errors for ArrayCtrl Vector< Vector< Value > > things. and i kind of cant figure out why and how to potentially fix it.

nonetheless, Add is done, what about Insert and Set behaviour? should do the same..

i've added the current proposal, based on your changes.

Attachment: Core.rar
(Size: 310.15KB, Downloaded 228 times)

[Updated on: Fri, 17 September 2010 10:33]

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 29 July 2010 22:17
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Tue, 03 August 2010 11:15
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: andrei_natanael on Tue, 03 August 2010 12:53
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Tue, 03 August 2010 16:06
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: andrei_natanael on Tue, 03 August 2010 22:44
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 04 August 2010 09:57
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 05 August 2010 08:35
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mrjt on Thu, 05 August 2010 09:55
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 05 August 2010 10:10
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 06 August 2010 11:27
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Fri, 06 August 2010 11:48
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 09 August 2010 08:50
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 13 August 2010 09:38
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 16 August 2010 09:06
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 30 August 2010 10:46
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Mon, 06 September 2010 10:53
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 06 September 2010 11:52
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Wed, 08 September 2010 09:00
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: rylek on Wed, 08 September 2010 10:24
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 08 September 2010 10:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Wed, 08 September 2010 11:30
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Fri, 17 September 2010 08:11
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Fri, 17 September 2010 09:15
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 October 2010 09:02
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Thu, 21 October 2010 11:10
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Thu, 21 October 2010 11:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Wed, 30 March 2011 10:54
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Sat, 16 April 2011 20:31
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Sun, 17 April 2011 14:46
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: mirek on Sun, 17 April 2011 21:43
		Re: why not "T & Add(const T & x)" in all containers By: kohait00 on Mon, 18 April 2011 09:00

Previous Topic:	InitCaps() proposal
Next Topic:	Incorrect implementation of INITBLOCK (and similar macros) in case when flagBLITZ is not defined.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Aug 25 10:51:47 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06572 seconds