Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Value: why not float support?
Re: Value: why not float support? [message #30363 is a reply to message #30336] |
Sun, 26 December 2010 11:28   |
 |
kohait00
Messages: 939 Registered: July 2009 Location: Germany
|
Experienced Contributor |
|
|
well, i'm not trying to invent things to convince you of something. if i cant than maybe the reasons are not strong enough 
i'm planning to release a test environment for OSC past xmas, where i have some time to clean up things, order code and make some small docus. but for that to happen i also need to know where the train in terms of value type extension goes, so as to be able to use implicitly float or to need to invent some hack to handle this. because this affects the API. (also, there is some controls issue, since OSC only makes some sense when there are good and easy menas to generate the messages, see TouchOSC for iphone).
concerning double and float in databases: i'm sure the major db's *dont* simply convert it internally. at least not in terms of storage (millions and millions of rows with wasted 4 bytes for double, where float had been enough cant be aforded). thats why one generally is to think of a good, well fitting model/schema for one's problem, not to waste space and performance when handling the data.
as i stated before, i am not fixed on float extension, when there is a possibility to 'enrich' IsNumber() and the implicit converters by a user type. maybe we should think of that, instead.
|
|
|
 |
|
Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Mon, 30 August 2010 10:54
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Tue, 31 August 2010 15:49
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Tue, 31 August 2010 16:11
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Tue, 31 August 2010 18:49
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Tue, 31 August 2010 22:02
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: gprentice on Wed, 01 September 2010 13:52
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Wed, 01 September 2010 16:13
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Thu, 02 September 2010 09:40
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Thu, 02 September 2010 11:24
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Mon, 06 September 2010 10:40
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Mon, 06 September 2010 11:54
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Mon, 13 December 2010 15:47
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Wed, 15 December 2010 16:15
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Wed, 15 December 2010 16:41
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: rylek on Mon, 20 December 2010 23:08
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 December 2010 08:20
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Fri, 24 December 2010 12:39
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Fri, 24 December 2010 13:55
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Sat, 25 December 2010 10:48
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Sun, 26 December 2010 11:28
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Mon, 27 December 2010 13:20
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Mon, 27 December 2010 14:28
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Mon, 27 December 2010 14:44
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Tue, 28 December 2010 13:47
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Mon, 07 March 2011 14:31
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: mirek on Mon, 07 March 2011 23:04
|
 |
|
Re: Value: why not float support?
By: kohait00 on Tue, 08 March 2011 08:33
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Aug 26 00:12:26 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.06200 seconds
|