Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Arrys vs Vectors
Re: Arrys vs Vectors [message #30389 is a reply to message #30380] |
Mon, 27 December 2010 13:29   |
 |
mirek
Messages: 14267 Registered: November 2005
|
Ultimate Member |
|
|
281264 wrote on Mon, 27 December 2010 05:51 | Thank you for your answers and advises.
Regarding DUMPC et al. I am getting used to them and find DUMPC and Logfile very useful. It works very well, thanks. Remark: By the way,
**Query: what are DUMPCC, DUMPCCC and DDUMPC for?. So far I only know DUMP and DUMPC.
|
DUMPCC is for dumpning container of containers...
Quote: |
Another question more related to C++: the usage of pointers and Arrays of pointers as class member variables is difficult to me for things like s%*p1…. In Serialize function does not work.
|
Well, the U++ way is to try to avoid pointers as much as possible...
Why not use proper objects instead?
Quote: |
**Query: if I have an Array<ptr*> as a variable private member of a class, does it work? Is it any limitation in the NTL containers for being used as containers of pointers to classes as member variables of a class?
|
No. Just you have to keep in mind that the object then in container is pointer... 
Also, if you need to store pointers, Vector<ptr*> is most likely the better option.
Quote: |
Regarding DeepCopyOptionness I am using it in all my classes for I find it very useful.
**Query: Does it penalize or increases the complexity of the code in any way whatsoever?
|
DeepCopy _Option_ is definitely fine as it is only used explicitly.
Still, I surprised you are using that so much. I found using myself the deep-copy-option quite rarely.
Quote: |
**Query: Is there any way to preserve the U++ personal configuration between installations?
|
I guess once you get accustomed, you will start recompiling theide based on svn - then you just replace theide.exe and keep configuration.
I guess the "U++ installation" should perhaps rather be considered to be "U++ starter pack" 
Mirek
[Updated on: Mon, 27 December 2010 13:30] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
 |
|
Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 10:43
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 December 2010 11:20
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 11:43
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 December 2010 11:51
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 12:08
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 December 2010 12:36
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 17:23
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 December 2010 17:54
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: mirek on Sat, 25 December 2010 10:57
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Sun, 26 December 2010 10:07
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Mon, 27 December 2010 11:51
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: mirek on Mon, 27 December 2010 13:29
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Mon, 27 December 2010 14:15
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: mirek on Mon, 27 December 2010 13:23
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 18:20
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 December 2010 19:48
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 21:54
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 22:04
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: kohait00 on Tue, 21 December 2010 22:12
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: 281264 on Tue, 21 December 2010 19:04
|
 |
|
Re: Arrys vs Vectors
By: Didier on Tue, 21 December 2010 19:45
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Tue Aug 26 15:41:04 CEST 2025
Total time taken to generate the page: 0.05371 seconds
|