U++ forum: Welcome to the forum

Search on this site

Search in forums

Home » U++ Library support » U++ Core » Optional serialization techniques

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Optional serialization techniques [message #31368 is a reply to message #31357]

Fri, 25 February 2011 15:34

Mindtraveller
Messages: 917
Registered: August 2007
Location: Russia, Moscow rgn.

Experienced Contributor

Thanks everyone for the answers. I guess the problem is solved.

mirek wrote on Fri, 25 February 2011 11:46

That said, it does not solve the problem all the time and generally, I would NOT recommend using binary serialization for permanent storage of important files. It is fine for configs (where if you loose one, it is not that bad) or for transfering data (e.g. over network).
Do not use it for documents Smile

BTW, why? Looks like not a bad storage solution.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Optional serialization techniques By: Mindtraveller on Thu, 24 February 2011 16:27
		Re: Optional serialization techniques By: mirek on Fri, 25 February 2011 09:46
		Re: Optional serialization techniques By: koldo on Fri, 25 February 2011 10:14
		Re: Optional serialization techniques By: Mindtraveller on Fri, 25 February 2011 15:34
		Re: Optional serialization techniques By: mirek on Fri, 25 February 2011 19:42
		Re: Optional serialization techniques By: tojocky on Sat, 26 February 2011 07:49
		Re: Optional serialization techniques By: mirek on Fri, 04 March 2011 10:01
		Re: Optional serialization techniques By: chickenk on Fri, 25 February 2011 11:16

Previous Topic:	do upp have an equivalent of "eval()" in Javascript
Next Topic:	Core/Path.cpp: the limitation of GetCurrentDirectory for POSIX

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Aug 26 06:16:40 CEST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00691 seconds